LD 432
pg. 11
Page 10 of 63 An Act to Adopt the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act ... Page 12 of 63
Download Bill Text
LR 316
Item 1

 
The term "issuing State" is borrowed from UIFSA. In UIFSA, it
refers to the court that issued the support or parentage order.
Here, it refers to the State, or the court, which made the
custody determination that is sought to be enforced. It is used
primarily in Article 3 [Me. cite subchapter III].

 
The term "person" has been added to ensure that the provisions
of this Act apply when the State is the moving party in a custody
proceeding or has legal custody of a child. The definition of
"person" is the one that is mandated for all Uniform Acts.

 
The term "person acting as a parent" has been slightly
redefined. It has been broadened from the definition in the
UCCJA to include a person who has acted as a parent for a
significant period of time prior to the filing of the custody
proceeding as well as a person who currently has physical custody
of the child. In addition, a person acting as a parent must
either have legal custody or claim a right to legal custody under
the law of this State. The reference to the law of this State
means that a court determines the issue of whether someone is a
"person acting as a parent" under its own law. This reaffirms
the traditional view that a court in a child custody case applies
its own substantive law. The court does not have to undertake a
choice-of-law analysis to determine whether the individual who is
claiming to be a person acting as a parent has standing to seek
custody of the child.

 
The definition of "tribe" is the one mandated for use in
Uniform Acts. Should a State choose to apply this Act to tribal
adjudications, this definition should be enacted as well as the
entirety of Section 104 [Me. cite section 1734].

 
The term "contestant" as has been omitted from this revision.
It was defined in the UCCJA § 2(1) as "a person, including a
parent, who claims a right to custody or visitation rights with
respect to a child." It seems to have served little purpose over
the years, and whatever function it once had has been subsumed by
state laws on who has standing to seek custody of or visitation
with a child. In addition UCCJA § 2(5) of the which defined
"decree" and "custody decree" has been eliminated as duplicative
of the definition of "custody determination."

 
§1733.__Proceedings governed by other law

 
This chapter does not govern an adoption proceeding or a
proceeding pertaining to the authorization of emergency medical
care for a child.

 
Uniform Comment


Page 10 of 63 Top of Page Page 12 of 63