| | Subsections (b) and (c) [Me. cite subsections 2 and 3] clearly | State the relationship between jurisdiction under this Act and | other forms of jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction over, or the | physical presence of, a parent or the child is neither necessary | nor required under this Act. In other words neither minimum | contacts nor service within the State is required for the court | to have jurisdiction to make a custody determination. Further, | the presence of minimum contacts or service within the State does | not confer jurisdiction to make a custody determination. Subject | to Section 204 [Me. cite section 1748], satisfaction of the | requirements of subsection (a) [Me. cite subsection 1] is | mandatory. |
|
| | The requirements of this section, plus the notice and hearing | provisions of the Act, are all that is necessary to satisfy due | process. This Act, like the UCCJA and the PKPA is based on | Justice Frankfurter's concurrence in May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. | 528 (1953). As pointed out by Professor Bodenheimer, the | reporter for the UCCJA, no "workable interstate custody law could | be built around [Justice] Burton's plurality opinion ... . | Bridgette Bodenheimer, The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction | Act: A Legislative Remedy for Children Caught in the Conflict of | Laws, 22 Vand.L.Rev. 1207,1233 (1969). It should also be noted | that since jurisdiction to make a child custody determination is | subject matter jurisdiction, an agreement of the parties to | confer jurisdiction on a court that would not otherwise have | jurisdiction under this Act is ineffective. |
|
| §1746.__Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction |
|
| | 1.__Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction.__Except as otherwise | provided in section 1748, a court of this State that has made a | child custody determination consistent with section 1745 or 1747 | has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over the determination | until: |
|
| A.__A court of this State determines that neither the child, | nor the child and one parent, nor the child and a person | acting as a parent have a significant connection with this | State and that substantial evidence is no longer available | in this State concerning the child's care, protection, | training and personal relationships; or |
|
| B.__A court of this State or a court of another state | determines that the child, the child's parents and any | person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this | State. |
|
| | 2.__Modification without exclusive, continuing jurisdiction.__ | A court of this State that has made a child |
|
|