| Subsection (c) [Me. cite subsection 3] concerns the problem of |
simultaneous proceedings in the State with modification |
jurisdiction and enforcement proceedings under Article 3 [Me. |
cite subchapter III]. This section authorizes the court with |
exclusive, continuing jurisdiction to stay the modification |
proceeding pending the outcome of the enforcement proceeding, to |
enjoin the parties from continuing with the enforcement |
proceeding, or to continue the modification proceeding under such |
conditions as it determines are appropriate. The court may wish |
to communicate with the enforcement court. However, |
communication is not mandatory. Although the enforcement State |
is required by the PKPA to enforce according to its terms a |
custody determination made consistently with the PKPA, that duty |
is subject to the decree being modified by a State with the power |
to do so under the PKPA. An order to enjoin the parties from |
enforcing the decree is the equivalent of a temporary |
modification by a State with the authority to do so. The |
concomitant provision addressed to the enforcement court is |
Section 306 [Me. cite section 1766] of this Act. That section |
requires the enforcement court to communicate with the |
modification court in order to determine what action the |
modification court wishes the enforcement court to take. |