LD 1347
pg. 1
LD 1347 Title Page An Act Addressing an Allegation of Prior Conviction When the Sentence Is Enhanc... Page 2 of 2
Download Bill Text
LR 1591
Item 1

 
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:

 
Sec. 1. 15 MRSA §757, as repealed and replaced by PL 1981, c. 679,
§1, is repealed.

 
Sec. 2. 17-A MRSA §9-A is enacted to read:

 
9-A.__Allegation of prior conviction when sentence enhanced

 
1.__Except as otherwise provided by law, a prior conviction
must be specially alleged if the sentencing provision of a crime
requires that a present sentence be enhanced because the person
has been previously convicted of a specified crime.__For the
purpose of this section, a sentence is enhanced only if the
maximum sentence that may be imposed is increased or a mandatory
minimum nonsuspendable sentence must be imposed.__The Supreme
Judicial Court shall provide by rule the manner of alleging the
prior conviction in a charging instrument and conditions for
using that prior conviction at trial.

 
2.__If the name and date of birth of the person charged with
the current principal offense are the same as those of the person
who has been convicted of the prior offense, it is presumed that
the person charged with the current principal offense is the same
person as that person convicted of the prior offense.

 
Sec. 3. 29-A MRSA §2412-A, sub-§3, last ¶, as amended by PL 1995, c. 645,
Pt. B. §19, is further amended to read:

 
A separate reading of the allegation and a separate trial as are
not required by Title 15, section 757 do not apply to a
proceeding under this subsection.

 
Sec. 4. 29-A MRSA §2433, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1993, c. 683, Pt. A,
§2 and affected by Pt. B, §5, is amended to read:

 
1. Permissible considerations. Notwithstanding the
provisions of Title 15 17-A, section 757 9-A, in determining the
appropriate sentence, the court shall consider whether the
defendant operated with a passenger under 16 years of age, the
record of convictions for criminal traffic offenses,
adjudications of traffic infractions or suspensions of license
for failure to submit to a test.

 
In determining the appropriate sentence, the court may rely on
oral representations based on records maintained by the courts,
the State Bureau of Identification or the Secretary of State,
including telecommunications of records maintained by the
Secretary of State.


LD 1347 Title Page Top of Page Page 2 of 2