| chattel paper, investment property, or a letter-of-credit right. |
| The duty to terminate the secured party's control is analogous to |
| the duty to file a termination statement, imposed by Section 9- |
| 513 [Maine cite section 9-1513]. Under subsection (a) [Maine |
| cite subsection (1)], it applies only when there is no |
| outstanding secured obligation and the secured party is not |
| committed to give value. The requirements of this section can be |
| varied by agreement under Section 1-102(3). For example, a |
| debtor could by contract agree that the secured party may release |
| its control of investment property under subsection (a)(1) [Maine |
| cite subsection (1), paragraph (a)] more than three days |
| following demand. Also, duties under this section should not be |
| read to conflict with the terms of the collateral itself. For |
| example, if the collateral is a time deposit account, subsection |
| (b)(3) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraph (c)] should not |
| require a secured party with control to make an early withdrawal |
| of the funds (assuming that were possible) in order to pay them |
| over to the debtor or put them in an account in the debtor's |
| name. |