| Paragraph (1) [Maine cite paragraph (a)] substantially |
| simplifies the choice-of-law rules. Former Section 9-103 |
| contained different choice-of-law rules for different types |
| of collateral. Under Section 9-301(1) [Maine cite section |
| 9-1301, subsection (1)], the law of a single jurisdiction |
| governs perfection with respect to most types of collateral, |
| both tangible and intangible. Paragraph (1) [Maine cite |
| paragraph (a)] eliminates the need for former Section 9- |
| 103(1)(c), which concerned purchase-money security interests |
| in tangible collateral that is intended to move from one |
| jurisdiction to the other. It is likely to reduce the |
| frequency of cases in which the governing law changes after |
| a financing statement is properly filed. (Presumably, |
| debtors change their own location less frequently than they |
| change the location of their collateral.) The approach |
| taken in paragraph (1) [Maine cite paragraph (a)] also |
| eliminates some difficult priority issues and the need to |
| distinguish between "mobile" and "ordinary" goods, and it |
| reduces the number of filing offices in which secured |
| parties must file or search when collateral is located in |
| several jurisdictions. |