| 6. External Constraints on This Section. The need to |
| coordinate Article 9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] with a variety of |
| nonuniform certificate-of-title statutes, the need to provide |
| rules to take account of situations in which multiple |
| certificates of title are outstanding with respect to particular |
| goods, and the need to govern the transition from perfection by |
| filing in one jurisdiction to perfection by notation in another |
| all create pressure for a detailed and complex set of rules. In |
| an effort to minimize complexity, this Article does not attempt |
| to coordinate Article 9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] with the entire |
| array of certificate-of-title statutes. In particular, Sections |
| 9-303 [Maine cite section 9-1303], 9-311 [Maine cite section 9- |
| 1311], and 9-316(d) and (e) [Maine cite section 9-1316, |
| subsections (4) and (5)] assume that the certificate-of-title |
| statutes to which they apply do not have relation-back provisions |
| (i.e., provisions under which perfection is deemed to occur at a |
| time earlier than when the perfection steps actually are taken). |
| A Legislative Note to Section 9-311 [Maine cite section 9-1311] |
| recommends the elimination of relation-back provisions in |
| certificate-of-title statutes affecting perfection of security |
| interests. |