LD 2245
pg. 134
Page 133 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 135 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
9-1305, subsection (3)]. It also governs priority of a security
interest in certain types of intangible collateral, such as
accounts, electronic chattel paper, and general intangibles.
This section determines the location of the debtor for choice-of-
law purposes, but not for other purposes. See subsection (k)
[Maine cite subsection (11)].

 
Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] states the general
rules: An individual debtor is deemed to be located at the
individual's principal residence with respect to both personal
and business assets. Any other debtor is deemed to be located at
its place of business if it has only one, or at its chief
executive office if it has more than one place of business.

 
As used in this section, a "place of business" means a place
where the debtor conducts its affairs. See subsection (a) [Maine
cite subsection (1)]. Thus, every organization, even
eleemosynary institutions and other organizations that do not
conduct "for profit" business activities, has a "place of
business." Under subsection (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)], a
person who ceases to exist, have a residence, or have a place of
business continues to be located in the jurisdiction determined
by subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)].

 
The term "chief executive office" is not defined in this
Section or elsewhere in the Uniform Commercial Code. "Chief
executive office" means the place from which the debtor manages
the main part of its business operations or other affairs. This
is the place where persons dealing with the debtor would normally
look for credit information, and is the appropriate place for
filing. With respect to most multi-state debtors, it will be
simple to determine which of the debtor's offices is the "chief
executive office." Even when a doubt arises, it would be rare
that there could be more than two possibilities. A secured party
in such a case may protect itself by perfecting under the law of
each possible jurisdiction.

 
Similarly, the term "principal residence" is not defined. If
the security interest in question is a purchase-money security
interest in consumer goods which is perfected upon attachment,
see Section 9-309(1) [Maine cite section 9-1309, subsection (1)],
the choice of law may make no difference. In other cases, when a
doubt arises, prudence may dictate perfecting under the law of
each jurisdiction that might be the debtor's "principal
residence."

 
The general rule is subject to several exceptions, each of
which is discussed below.


Page 133 of 493 Top of Page Page 135 of 493