LD 2245
pg. 144
Page 143 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 145 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
lenders may require that the transactions be structured as "hard
pledges," where the securities are transferred on the books of a
clearing corporation from the debtor's account to the lender's
account or to a special pledge account for the lender where they
cannot be disposed of without the specific consent of the lender.
In other circumstances, lenders are content with so-called
"agreement to pledge" or "agreement to deliver" arrangements,
where the debtor retains the positions in its own account, but
reflects on its books that the positions have been hypothecated
and promises that the securities will be transferred to the
secured party's account on demand.

 
The perfection and priority rules of this Article are designed
to facilitate current secured financing arrangements for
securities firms as well as to provide sufficient flexibility to
accommodate new arrangements that develop in the future. Hard
pledge arrangements are covered by the concept of control. See
Sections 9-314 [Maine cite section 9-1314], 9-106 [Maine cite
section 9-1106], 8-106. Non-control secured financing
arrangements for securities firms are covered by the automatic
perfection rule of paragraph (10) [Maine cite paragraph (j)].
Before the 1994 revision of Articles 8 and 9, agreement to pledge
arrangements could be implemented under a provision that a
security interest in securities given for new value under a
written security agreement was perfected without filing or
possession for a period of 21 days. Although the security
interests were temporary in legal theory, the financing
arrangements could, in practice, be continued indefinitely by
rolling over the loans at least every 21 days. Accordingly, a
knowledgeable creditor of a securities firm realizes that the
firm's securities may be subject to security interests that are
not discoverable from any public records. The automatic-
perfection rule of paragraph (10) [Maine cite paragraph (j)]
makes it unnecessary to engage in the purely formal practice of
rolling over these arrangements every 21 days.

 
In some circumstances, a clearing corporation may be the
debtor in a secured financing arrangement. For example, a
clearing corporation that settles delivery-versus-payment
transactions among its participants on a net, same-day basis
relies on timely payments from all participants with net
obligations due to the system. If a participant that is a net
debtor were to default on its payment obligation, the clearing
corporation would not receive some of the funds needed to settle
with participants that are net creditors to the system. To
complete end-of-day settlement after a payment default by a
participant, a clearing corporation that settles on a net, same-
day basis may need to draw on credit lines and pledge securities
of the defaulting participant or other securities pledged by
participants in the clearing corporation to secure


Page 143 of 493 Top of Page Page 145 of 493