| "Control," for these purposes, is explained in Section 9-107 | [Maine cite section 9-1107]. |
|
| | 7. Goods Covered by Document of Title. Subsection (c) | [Maine cite subsection (3)] applies to goods in the possession of | a bailee who has issued a negotiable document covering the goods. | Subsection (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)] applies to goods in | the possession of a bailee who has issued a nonnegotiable | document of title, including a document of title that is "non- | negotiable" under Section 7-104. Section 9-313 [Maine cite | section 9-1313] governs perfection of a security interest in | goods in the possession of a bailee who has not issued a document | of title. |
|
| | Subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] clarifies the | perfection and priority rules in former Section 9-304(2). | Consistently with the provisions of Article 7, subsection (c) | takes the position that, as long as a negotiable document | covering goods is outstanding, title to the goods is, so to say, | locked up in the document. Accordingly, a security interest in | goods covered by a negotiable document may be perfected by | perfecting a security interest in the document. The security | interest also may be perfected by another method, e.g., by | filing. The priority rule in subsection (c) [Maine cite | subsection (3)] governs only priority between (i) a security | interest in goods which is perfected by perfecting in the | document and (ii) a security interest in the goods which becomes | perfected by another method while the goods are covered by the | document. |
|
| | Example 1: While wheat is in a grain elevator and covered by | a negotiable warehouse receipt, Debtor creates a security | interest in the wheat in favor of SP-1 and SP-2. SP-1 perfects | by filing a financing statement covering "wheat." Thereafter, | SP-2 perfects by filing a financing statement describing the | warehouse receipt. Subsection (c)(1) provides that SP-2's | security interest is perfected. Subsection (c)(2) [Maine cite | subsection (3), paragraph (b)] provides that SP-2's security | interest is senior to SP-1's. |
|
| | Example 2: The facts are as in Example 1, but SP-1's security | interest attached and was perfected before the goods were | delivered to the grain elevator. Subsection (c)(2) [Maine cite | subsection (3), paragraph (b)] does not apply, because SP-1's | security interest did not become perfected during the time that | the wheat was in the possession of a bailee. Rather, the first- | to-file-or-perfect priority rule applies. See Section 9-322 | [Maine cite section 9-1322]. |
|
|