LD 2245
pg. 157
Page 156 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 158 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
"Control," for these purposes, is explained in Section 9-107
[Maine cite section 9-1107].

 
7. Goods Covered by Document of Title. Subsection (c)
[Maine cite subsection (3)] applies to goods in the possession of
a bailee who has issued a negotiable document covering the goods.
Subsection (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)] applies to goods in
the possession of a bailee who has issued a nonnegotiable
document of title, including a document of title that is "non-
negotiable" under Section 7-104. Section 9-313 [Maine cite
section 9-1313] governs perfection of a security interest in
goods in the possession of a bailee who has not issued a document
of title.

 
Subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] clarifies the
perfection and priority rules in former Section 9-304(2).
Consistently with the provisions of Article 7, subsection (c)
takes the position that, as long as a negotiable document
covering goods is outstanding, title to the goods is, so to say,
locked up in the document. Accordingly, a security interest in
goods covered by a negotiable document may be perfected by
perfecting a security interest in the document. The security
interest also may be perfected by another method, e.g., by
filing. The priority rule in subsection (c) [Maine cite
subsection (3)] governs only priority between (i) a security
interest in goods which is perfected by perfecting in the
document and (ii) a security interest in the goods which becomes
perfected by another method while the goods are covered by the
document.

 
Example 1: While wheat is in a grain elevator and covered by
a negotiable warehouse receipt, Debtor creates a security
interest in the wheat in favor of SP-1 and SP-2. SP-1 perfects
by filing a financing statement covering "wheat." Thereafter,
SP-2 perfects by filing a financing statement describing the
warehouse receipt. Subsection (c)(1) provides that SP-2's
security interest is perfected. Subsection (c)(2) [Maine cite
subsection (3), paragraph (b)] provides that SP-2's security
interest is senior to SP-1's.

 
Example 2: The facts are as in Example 1, but SP-1's security
interest attached and was perfected before the goods were
delivered to the grain elevator. Subsection (c)(2) [Maine cite
subsection (3), paragraph (b)] does not apply, because SP-1's
security interest did not become perfected during the time that
the wheat was in the possession of a bailee. Rather, the first-
to-file-or-perfect priority rule applies. See Section 9-322
[Maine cite section 9-1322].


Page 156 of 493 Top of Page Page 158 of 493