LD 2245
pg. 17
Page 16 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 18 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
duties. Former Section 9-504(5) did not address whether a
secured party was relieved of its duties in this situation.

 
Transfer of record or legal title. Section 9-619 [Maine cite
section 9-1619] contains a new provision making clear that a
transfer of record or legal title to a secured party is not of
itself a disposition under Part 6. This rule applies regardless
of the circumstances under which the transfer of title occurs.

 
Strict foreclosure. Section 9-620 [Maine cite section 9-
1620], unlike former Section 9-505, permits a secured party to
accept collateral in partial satisfaction, as well as full
satisfaction, of the obligations secured. This right of strict
foreclosure extends to intangible as well as tangible property.
Section 9-622 [Maine cite section 9-1622] clarifies the effects
of an acceptance of collateral on the rights of junior claimants.
It rejects the approach taken by some courts--deeming a secured
party to have constructively retained collateral in satisfaction
of the secured obligations--in the case of a secured party's
unreasonable delay in the disposition of collateral. Instead,
unreasonable delay is relevant when determining whether a
disposition under Section 9-610 [Maine cite section 9-1610] is
commercially reasonable.

 
Effect of noncompliance: "Rebuttable presumption" test.
Section 9-626 [Maine cite section 9-1626] adopts the "rebuttable
presumption" test for the failure of a secured party to proceed
in accordance with certain provisions of Part 6. (As discussed
in Comment 4.j., the test does not necessarily apply to consumer
transactions.) Under this approach, the deficiency claim of a
noncomplying secured party is calculated by crediting the obligor
with the greater of the actual net proceeds of a disposition and
the amount of net proceeds that would have been realized if the
disposition had been conducted in accordance with Part 6 (e.g.,
in a commercially reasonable manner). For non-consumer
transactions, Section 9-626 [Maine cite section 9-1626] rejects
the "absolute bar" test that some courts have imposed; that
approach bars a noncomplying secured party from recovering any
deficiency, regardless of the loss (if any) the debtor suffered
as a consequence of the noncompliance.

 
"Low-price" dispositions: Calculation of deficiency and
surplus. Section 9-615(f) [Maine cite section 9-1615, subsection
(6)] addresses the problem of procedurally regular dispositions
that fetch a low price. Subsection (f) [Maine cite subsection
(6)] provides a special method for calculating a deficiency if
the proceeds of a disposition of collateral to a secured party, a
person related to the secured party, or a secondary obligor are
"significantly below the range of proceeds that a complying
disposition to a person other than the secured party, a person


Page 16 of 493 Top of Page Page 18 of 493