| Effect of noncompliance: "Rebuttable presumption" test. |
Section 9-626 [Maine cite section 9-1626] adopts the "rebuttable |
presumption" test for the failure of a secured party to proceed |
in accordance with certain provisions of Part 6. (As discussed |
in Comment 4.j., the test does not necessarily apply to consumer |
transactions.) Under this approach, the deficiency claim of a |
noncomplying secured party is calculated by crediting the obligor |
with the greater of the actual net proceeds of a disposition and |
the amount of net proceeds that would have been realized if the |
disposition had been conducted in accordance with Part 6 (e.g., |
in a commercially reasonable manner). For non-consumer |
transactions, Section 9-626 [Maine cite section 9-1626] rejects |
the "absolute bar" test that some courts have imposed; that |
approach bars a noncomplying secured party from recovering any |
deficiency, regardless of the loss (if any) the debtor suffered |
as a consequence of the noncompliance. |