LD 2245
pg. 196
Page 195 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 197 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
are unperfected, the first to attach has priority. Note that
Section 9-708(b) [Maine cite section 9-1708, subsection (2)] may
affect the application of subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection
(1)] to a filing that occurred before the effective date of this
Article and which would be ineffective to perfect a security
interest under former Article 9 but effective under this Article.

 
4. Competing Perfected Security Interests. When there is
more than one perfected security interest, the security interests
rank according to priority in time of filing or perfection.
"Filing," of course, refers to the filing of an effective
financing statement. "Perfection" refers to the acquisition of a
perfected security interest, i.e., one that has attached and as
to which any required perfection step has been taken. See
Section 9-308 [Maine cite section 9-1308].

 
Example 1: On February 1, A files a financing statement
covering a certain item of Debtor's equipment. On March 1, B
files a financing statement covering the same equipment. On
April 1, B makes a loan to Debtor and obtains a security interest
in the equipment. On May 1, A makes a loan to Debtor and obtains
a security interest in the same collateral. A has priority even
though B's loan was made earlier and was perfected when made. It
makes no difference whether A knew of B's security interest when
A made its advance.

 
The problem stated in Example 1 is peculiar to a notice-filing
system under which filing may occur before the security interest
attaches (see Section 9-502 [Maine cite section 9-1502]). The
justification for determining priority by order of filing lies in
the necessity of protecting the filing system-that is, of
allowing the first secured party who has filed to make subsequent
advances without each time having to check for subsequent filings
as a condition of protection. Note, however, that this first-to-
file protection is not absolute. For example, Section 9-324
[Maine cite section 9-1324] affords priority to certain purchase-
money security interests, even if a competing secured party was
the first to file or perfect.

 
Example 2: A and B make nonpurchase-money advances secured
by the same collateral. The collateral is in Debtor's
possession, and neither security interest is perfected when the
second advance is made. Whichever secured party first perfects
its security interest (by taking possession of the collateral or
by filing) takes priority. It makes no difference whether that
secured party knows of the other security interest at the time it
perfects its own.


Page 195 of 493 Top of Page Page 197 of 493