LD 2245
pg. 206
Page 205 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 207 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
advances made by a secured party after a third party acquires an
interest in the collateral. Subsection (a) [Maine cite
subsection (1)] applies when the third party is a competing
secured party. It replaces and clarifies former Section 9-
312(7). Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] deals with
lien creditors and replaces former Section 9-301(4). Subsections
(d) and (e) [Maine cite subsections (4) and (5)] deal with buyers
and replace former Section 9-307(3). Subsections (f) and (g)
[Maine cite subsections (6) and (7)] deal with lessees and
replace former Section 2A307(4).

 
3. Competing Security Interests. Under a proper reading of
the first-to-file-or perfect rule of Section 9-322(a)(1) [Maine
cite section 9-1322, subsection (1), paragraph (a)] (and former
Section 9-312(5)), it is abundantly clear that the time when an
advance is made plays no role in determining priorities among
conflicting security interests except when a financing statement
was not filed and the advance is the giving of value as the last
step for attachment and perfection. Thus, a secured party takes
subject to all advances secured by a competing security interest
having priority under Section 9-322(a)(1) [Maine cite section 9-
1322, subsection (1), paragraph (a)]. This result generally
obtains regardless of how the competing security interest is
perfected and regardless of whether the advances are made
"pursuant to commitment" (Section 9-102 [Maine cite section 9-
1102]). Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] of this
section states the only other instance when the time of an
advance figures in the priority scheme in Section 9-322 [Maine
cite section 9-1322]: when the security interest is perfected
only automatically under Section 9-309 [Maine cite section 9-
1309] or temporarily under Section 9-312(e), (f), or (g) [Maine
cite section 9-1312, subsection (5), (6) or (7)], and the advance
is not made pursuant to a commitment entered into while the
security interest was perfected by another method. Thus, an
advance has priority from the date it is made only in the rare
case in which it is made without commitment and while the
security interest is perfected only temporarily under Section 9-
312 [Maine cite section 9-1312].

 
The new formulation in subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection
(1)] clarifies the result when the initial advance is paid and a
new ("future") advance is made subsequently. Under former
Section 9-312(7), the priority of the new advance turned on
whether it was "made while a security interest is perfected."
This section resolves any ambiguity by omitting the quoted
phrase.

 
Example 1: On February 1, A makes an advance secured by
machinery in the debtor's possession and files a financing
statement. On March 1, B makes an advance secured by the same
machinery and files a financing statement. On April 1, A makes a


Page 205 of 493 Top of Page Page 207 of 493