| The arrangement between an inventory secured party and its |
debtor typically requires the secured party to make periodic |
advances against incoming inventory or periodic releases of old |
inventory as new inventory is received. A fraudulent debtor may |
apply to the secured party for advances even though it has |
already given a purchase-money security interest in the inventory |
to another secured party. For this reason, subsections (b)(2) |
through (4) and (c) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraphs (b) to |
(d) and subsection (3)] impose a second condition for the |
purchase-money security interest's achieving priority: the |
purchase-money secured party must give notification to the holder |
of a conflicting security interest who filed against the same |
item or type of inventory before the purchase-money secured party |
filed or its security interest became perfected temporarily under |
Section 9-312(e) or (f) [Maine cite section 9-1312, subsection |
(5) or (6)]. The notification requirement protects the non- |
purchase-money inventory secured party in such a situation: if |
the inventory secured party has received notification, it |
presumably will not make an advance; if it has not received |
notification (or if the other security interest does not qualify |
as purchase-money), any advance the inventory secured party may |
make ordinarily will have priority under Section 9-322 [Maine |
cite section 9-1322]. Inasmuch as an arrangement for periodic |
advances against incoming goods is unusual outside the inventory |
field, subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] does not |
contain a notification requirement. |