| Frequently, under applicable law, goods of the type described |
| in subsection (e)(2) [Maine cite subsection (5), paragraph (b)] |
| will not be considered to have become part of the real property. |
| In those cases, the fixture security interest does not conflict |
| with a real-property interest, and resort to this section is |
| unnecessary. However, if the goods have become part of the real |
| property, subsection (e)(2) [Maine cite subsection (5), paragraph |
| (b)] enables a fixture secured party to take priority over a |
| conflicting real-property interest if the fixture security |
| interest is perfected by a fixture filing or by any other method |
| permitted by this Article. If perfection is by fixture filing, |
| the fixture security interest would have priority over |
| subsequently recorded real-property interests under subsection |
| (e)(1) [Maine cite subsection (5), paragraph (a)] and, if the |
| fixture security interest is a purchase-money security interest |
| (a likely scenario), it would also have priority over most real |
| property interests under the purchasemoney priority of subsection |
| (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)]. Note, however, that unlike the |
| purchase-money priority rule in subsection (d) [Maine |