| Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] states the general |
| rule and provides that the bank may effectively exercise rights |
| of recoupment and setoff against the secured party. Subsection |
| (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] contains an exception: if the |
| secured party has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine cite |
| section 9-1104, subsection (1), paragraph (c)] (i.e., if it has |
| become the bank's customer), then any setoff exercised by the |
| bank against a debt owed by the debtor (as opposed to a debt owed |
| to the bank by the secured party) is ineffective. The bank may, |
| however, exercise its recoupment rights effectively. This result |
| is consistent with the priority rule in Section 9-327(4) [Maine |
| cite section 9-1327, subsection (4)], under which the security |
| interest of a bank in a deposit account is subordinate to that of |
| a secured party who has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine |
| cite section 9-1104, |
| subsection (1), paragraph (c)]. |