LD 2245
pg. 273
Page 272 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 274 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
SUBPART 4

 
RIGHTS OF BANK

 
§9-1340.__Effectiveness of right of recoupment or setoff against

 
deposit account

 
(1)__Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3), a bank
with which a deposit account is maintained may exercise any right
of recoupment or setoff against a secured party that holds a
security interest in the deposit account.

 
(2)__Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3), the
application of this Article to a security interest in a deposit
account does not affect a right of recoupment or setoff of the
secured party as to a deposit account maintained with the secured
party.

 
(3)__The exercise by a bank of a setoff against a deposit
account is ineffective against a secured party that holds a
security interest in the deposit account that is perfected by
control under section 9-1104, subsection (1), paragraph (c), if
the setoff is based on a claim against the debtor.

 
Official Comment

 
1. Source. New; subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)]
is based on a nonuniform Illinois amendment.

 
2. Setoff vs. Security Interest. This section resolves the
conflict between a security interest in a deposit account and the
bank's rights of recoupment and setoff.

 
Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] states the general
rule and provides that the bank may effectively exercise rights
of recoupment and setoff against the secured party. Subsection
(c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] contains an exception: if the
secured party has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine cite
section 9-1104, subsection (1), paragraph (c)] (i.e., if it has
become the bank's customer), then any setoff exercised by the
bank against a debt owed by the debtor (as opposed to a debt owed
to the bank by the secured party) is ineffective. The bank may,
however, exercise its recoupment rights effectively. This result
is consistent with the priority rule in Section 9-327(4) [Maine
cite section 9-1327, subsection (4)], under which the security
interest of a bank in a deposit account is subordinate to that of
a secured party who has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine
cite section 9-1104,
subsection (1), paragraph (c)].


Page 272 of 493 Top of Page Page 274 of 493