| Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] states the general |
rule and provides that the bank may effectively exercise rights |
of recoupment and setoff against the secured party. Subsection |
(c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] contains an exception: if the |
secured party has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine cite |
section 9-1104, subsection (1), paragraph (c)] (i.e., if it has |
become the bank's customer), then any setoff exercised by the |
bank against a debt owed by the debtor (as opposed to a debt owed |
to the bank by the secured party) is ineffective. The bank may, |
however, exercise its recoupment rights effectively. This result |
is consistent with the priority rule in Section 9-327(4) [Maine |
cite section 9-1327, subsection (4)], under which the security |
interest of a bank in a deposit account is subordinate to that of |
a secured party who has control under Section 9-104(a)(3) [Maine |
cite section 9-1104, |
subsection (1), paragraph (c)]. |