| This section does not displace other law that gives effect to |
| a non-consumer account debtor's agreement not to assert defenses |
| against an assignee, even if the agreement would not qualify |
| under subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)]. See subsection |
| (f) [Maine cite subsection (6)]. It validates, but does not |
| invalidate, agreements made by a non-consumer account debtor. |
| This section also does not displace other law to the extent that |
| the other law permits an assignee, who takes an assignment with |
| notice of a claim of a property or possessory right, a defense, |
| or a claim in recoupment, to enforce an account debtor's |
| agreement not to assert claims and defenses against the assignor |
| (e.g., a "hell-or-high-water" agreement). See Comment 4. It |
| also does not displace an assignee's right to assert that an |
| account debtor is estopped from asserting a claim or defense. |
| Nor does this section displace other law with respect to waivers |
| of potential future claims and defenses that are the subject of |
| an agreement between the account debtor and the assignee. |
| Finally, it does not displace Section 1-107, concerning waiver of |
| a breach that allegedly already has occurred. |