LD 2245
pg. 298
Page 297 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 299 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
in the general intangible but not to the security interest in the
account, which is not a health-care-insurance receivable.)

 
6. Effects on Account Debtors and Persons Obligated on
Promissory Notes. Subsections (a) and (c) [Maine cite
subsections (1) and (3)] affect two classes of persons. These
subsections affect account debtors on general intangibles and
health-care-insurance receivables and persons obligated on
promissory notes. Subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)]
also affects governmental entities that enact or determine rules
of law. However, subsection (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)]
ensures that these affected persons are not affected adversely.
That provision removes any burdens or adverse effects on these
persons for which any rational basis could exist to restrict the
effectiveness of an assignment or to exercise any remedies. For
this reason, the effects of subsections (a) and (c) [Maine cite
subsections (1) and (3)] are immaterial insofar as those persons
are concerned.

 
Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] does not override
terms that do not directly prohibit, restrict, or require consent
to an assignment but which might, nonetheless, present a
practical impairment of the assignment. Properly read, however,
this section, like Section 9-406(d) [Maine cite section 9-1406,
subsection (4)], reaches only covenants that prohibit, restrict,
or require consents to assignments; it does not override all
terms that might "impair" an assignment in fact.

 
Example 3: A licensor and licensee enter into an agreement
for the nonexclusive license of valuable business software. The
license agreement includes terms (i) prohibiting the licensee
from assigning its rights under the license, (ii) prohibiting the
licensee from disclosing to anyone certain information relating
to the software and the licensor, and (iii) deeming prohibited
assignments and prohibited disclosures to be defaults. The
licensee wishes to obtain financing and, in exchange, is willing
to grant a security interest in its rights under the license
agreement. The secured party, reasonably, refuses to extend
credit unless the licensee discloses the information that it is
prohibited from disclosing under the license agreement. The
secured party cannot determine the value of the proposed
collateral in the absence of this information. Under this
section, the terms of the license prohibiting the assignment
(grant of the security interest) and making the assignment a
default are ineffective. However, the nondisclosure covenant is
not a term that prohibits the assignment or creation of a
security interest in the license. Consequently, the
nondisclosure term is enforceable even though the practical
effect is to restrict the licensee's ability to use its rights
under the license agreement as collateral.


Page 297 of 493 Top of Page Page 299 of 493