| |  | | only with respect to purchasers for value; unlike former Section |  | 9-403(2), it does not apply with respect to lien creditors. | 
 | 
 
 
 |  | |  | Example 1:  SP-1 and SP-2 both hold security interests in the |  | same collateral.  Both security interests are perfected by |  | filing.  SP-1 filed first and has priority under Section |  | 9322(a)(1) [Maine cite section 9-1322, subsection (1), paragraph |  | (a)].  The effectiveness of SP-1's filing lapses.  As long as SP- |  | 2's security interest remains perfected thereafter, SP-2 is |  | entitled to priority over SP-1's security interest, which is |  | deemed never to have been perfected as against a purchaser for |  | value (SP-2).  See Section 9-322(a)(2) [Maine cite section 9- |  | 1322, subsection (1), paragraph (b)]. | 
 | 
 
 
 |  | |  | Example 2:  SP holds a security interest perfected by filing. |  | On July 1, LC acquires a judicial lien on the collateral.  Two |  | weeks later, the effectiveness of the financing statement lapses. |  | Although the security interest becomes unperfected upon lapse, it |  | was perfected when LC acquired its lien.  Accordingly, |  | notwithstanding the lapse, the perfected security interest has |  | priority over the rights of LC, who is not a purchaser.  See |  | Section 9-317(a)(2) [Maine cite section 9-1317, subsection (1), |  | paragraph (b)]. | 
 | 
 
 
 |  | |  | 4.  Effect of Debtor's Bankruptcy.  Under former Section 9- |  | 403(2), lapse was tolled if the debtor entered bankruptcy or |  | another insolvency proceeding.  Nevertheless, being unaware that |  | insolvency proceedings had been commenced, filing offices |  | routinely removed records from the files as if lapse had not been |  | tolled.  Subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] deletes the |  | former tolling provision and thereby imposes a new burden on the |  | secured party:  to be sure that a financing statement does not |  | lapse during the debtor's bankruptcy.  The secured party can |  | prevent lapse by filing a continuation statement, even without |  | first obtaining relief from the automatic stay.  See Bankruptcy |  | Code Section 362(b)(3).  Of course, if the debtor enters |  | bankruptcy before lapse, the provisions of this Article with |  | respect to lapse would be of no effect to the extent that federal |  | bankruptcy law dictates a contrary result (e.g., to the extent |  | that the Bankruptcy Code determines rights as of the date of the |  | filing of the bankruptcy petition). | 
 | 
 
 
 |  | |  | 5.  Continuation Statements.  Subsection (d) [Maine cite |  | subsection (4)] explains when a continuation statement may be |  | filed.  A continuation statement filed at a time other than that |  | prescribed by subsection (d) [Maine cite subsection (4)] is |  | ineffective, see Section 9-510(c) [Maine cite section 9-1510, |  | subsection (3)], and the filing office may not accept it.  See |  | Sections 9-520(a), 9-516(b) [Maine cite section 9-1520, |  | subsection (1), section 9-1516, subsection (2)].  Subsection (e) | 
 | 
 
 |