| for an authenticated security agreement. However, once the |
| security interest has become enforceable and has attached, it is |
| not impaired by the fact that the secured party's possession is |
| maintained without the agreement of a subsequent debtor (e.g., a |
| transferee). Possession as contemplated by Section 9-313 [Maine |
| cite section 9-1313] is possession for purposes of subsection |
| (b)(3)(B) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), subparagraph |
| (ii)], even though it may not constitute possession "pursuant to |
| the debtor's agreement" and consequently might not serve as a |
| substitute for an authenticated security agreement under |
| subsection (b)(3)(A) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), |
| subparagraph (i)]. Subsection (b)(3)(C) [Maine cite subsection |
| (2), paragraph (c), subparagraph (iii)] provides that delivery of |
| a certificated security to the secured party under Section 8-301 |
| [Maine cite section 8-1302] pursuant to the debtor's security |
| agreement is sufficient as a substitute for an authenticated |
| security agreement. Similarly, under subsection (b)(3)(D) [Maine |
| cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), subparagraph (iv)], control |
| of investment property, a deposit account, electronic chattel |
| paper, or a letter-of-credit right satisfies the evidentiary test |
| if control is pursuant to the debtor's security agreement. |