for an authenticated security agreement. However, once the |
security interest has become enforceable and has attached, it is |
not impaired by the fact that the secured party's possession is |
maintained without the agreement of a subsequent debtor (e.g., a |
transferee). Possession as contemplated by Section 9-313 [Maine |
cite section 9-1313] is possession for purposes of subsection |
(b)(3)(B) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), subparagraph |
(ii)], even though it may not constitute possession "pursuant to |
the debtor's agreement" and consequently might not serve as a |
substitute for an authenticated security agreement under |
subsection (b)(3)(A) [Maine cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), |
subparagraph (i)]. Subsection (b)(3)(C) [Maine cite subsection |
(2), paragraph (c), subparagraph (iii)] provides that delivery of |
a certificated security to the secured party under Section 8-301 |
[Maine cite section 8-1302] pursuant to the debtor's security |
agreement is sufficient as a substitute for an authenticated |
security agreement. Similarly, under subsection (b)(3)(D) [Maine |
cite subsection (2), paragraph (c), subparagraph (iv)], control |
of investment property, a deposit account, electronic chattel |
paper, or a letter-of-credit right satisfies the evidentiary test |
if control is pursuant to the debtor's security agreement. |