| 2.__Limited liability.__A person who would otherwise be a |
| responsible party for damage to a premises is not liable for the |
| damage if the person can establish by a preponderance of the |
| evidence that the damage was caused solely by an unauthorized act |
| or omission of a 3rd party who is not that person's employee or |
| agent.__ A person seeking relief from liability for the acts or |
| omission of a 3rd party causing damage to the premises must |
| demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the person |
| exercised due care and took precautions with respect to |
| foreseeable acts or omissions by 3rd parties or the consequences |
| that could foreseeably result from such acts or omissions in |
| light of all relevant facts and circumstances.__For purposes of |
| this subsection, a person may demonstrate the exercise of due |
| care if the person did not know or have reason to know that a 3rd |
| party was causing the damage. |