LD 1599
pg. 2
Page 1 of 2 An Act to Clarify the Maine Human Rights Act Concerning Responsibility for Empl... LD 1599 Title Page
Download Bill Text
LR 1860
Item 1

 
federal anti-discrimination statutes and have ruled the same way,
finding that individual supervisors are not personally liable. The
other 2 Circuit Courts have not decided the issue.

 
Last summer, in the case of Gordan v. Cummings (Docket #Cum-
99-254, April 19,2000), a panel of the Law Court voted 3-2 that
the Maine Human Rights Act makes supervisors personally liable
for employment discrimination. It based that determination
primarily on this same language. On July 25, 2000, the Law Court
withdrew that opinion and replaced it with one that did not
consider the question of personal liability for supervisory
employees.

 
The Gordan decisions have created uncertainty for the
commission and for employers and employees. This bill seeks to
resolve that uncertainty by making it clear that employers are
the proper parties to hold accountable for employment
discrimination, and that a person other than the employer is not
personally liable for discrimination. It does so by removing the
part of the definition in question and establishing employer
responsibility through a new section that eliminates any
ambiguity from the statute. This new section implements the
rationale of the federal courts in interpreting the analogous
federal statutes by providing that an employer is liable for the
actions of the employer's agents or persons acting in the
employer's interest under established principles of the law of
agency and respondeat superior.


Page 1 of 2 Top of Page LD 1599 Title Page