| | 2-B.__Outcome-based forest policy.__"Outcome-based forest | policy" means a science-based, voluntary process to achieve | agreed-upon economic, environmental and social outcomes in the | State's forest, as an alternative to prescriptive regulation, | demonstrating measurable progress towards achieving statewide | sustainability goals and allowing landowners to use creativity | and flexibility to achieve objectives, while providing for the | conservation of public trust resources and the public values of | forests. |
|
| | Sec. 3. 12 MRSA §8869, sub-§3-A is enacted to read: |
|
| | 3-A.__Plans for experimental areas.__Practices applied on an | experimental area created pursuant to section 8003, subsection 3, | paragraph Q should provide at least the equivalent forest and | environmental protection as provided by existing rules and any | applicable local regulations.__At a minimum, tests of outcome- | based principles should address: |
|
| B.__Water quality, wetlands and riparian zones; |
|
| C.__Timber supply and quality; |
|
| D.__Aesthetic impacts of timber harvesting; |
|
| E.__Biological diversity; and |
|
| F.__Public accountability. |
|
| The Governor shall appoint a panel of technical experts to work | with the director to implement, monitor and assess tests of | outcome-based forestry principles. |
|
| | Sec. 4. 12 MRSA §8869, sub-§7, as enacted by PL 1989, c. 555, §10, is | amended to read: |
|
| | 7. Application. This section shall apply applies to all | forest lands within the State, including land in municipal and | state ownership. Only state-owned or operated research forests | or, industrially owned research forests or outcome-based forest | policy experimental areas certified by the commissioner are | exempt from these requirements. |
|
| | Sec. 5. 12 MRSA §8869, sub-§13 is enacted to read: |
|
| | 13.__Confidential information.__Information provided to the | bureau voluntarily or to fulfill reporting requirements for the | purposes of establishing and monitoring outcome-based forest | policy experimental areas is designated as confidential for the |
|
| purposes of Title 1, section 402, subsection 3, paragraph A if | the bureau has determined that failure to designate the | information as confidential would provide competitors an | opportunity to obtain business or competitive advantage over the | person to whom the information belongs or pertains or would | result in loss or other significant detriment to that person.__ | Summary reports may be published that use aggregated data that do | not reveal the activities of an individual person or firm. |
|
| | Sec. 6. 12 MRSA §8879, sub-§1, as enacted by PL 1997, c. 720, §13, is | amended to read: |
|
| | 1. Content. The report must describe the condition of the | State's forests based on historical information and information | collected and analyzed by the bureau for the biennium. The | report must provide an assessment at the state level of progress | in achieving the standards developed pursuant to section 8876-A, | including the status and evolution of outcome-based forest | policy. The director shall also provide observations on | differences in achieving standards by landowner class. The | report must summarize importing and exporting of forest products | for foreign and interstate activities. The director shall obtain | public input during the preparation of the report through public | hearings and other appropriate methods. |
|
| | Emergency clause. In view of the emergency cited in the preamble, | this Act takes effect when approved. |
|
| | This bill adds outcome-based forest policy as another way for | landowners to manage forests in the State. The bill defines | outcome-based forest policy and makes the information provided to | the Department of Conservation, Bureau of Forestry concerning the | outcome-based forest policy experimental areas confidential. The | bill also directs the Director of the Bureau of Forestry in | cooperation with private landowners to create experimental areas | on private land where the principles and applicability of | outcome-based forest policy can be applied and tested. |
|
|