|
does not permit such orders to be issued when another support | order exists, thereby prohibiting a second tribunal from | establishing another support order and the accompanying | continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, see Sections | 205 and 206. |
|
| The 2001 rewording of Subsection (b) conforms the language to | the provisions of the UNIFORM PARENTAGE ACT (2000) regarding | the individual party who may be ordered to pay temporary | support. |
|
| | Sec. 29. 19-A MRSA §3101, as repealed and replaced by PL 1997, c. | 669, §20, is amended to read: |
|
| §3101. Employer's receipt of out-of-state income-withholding |
|
| | An income-withholding order issued in another state may be | sent by or on behalf of the obligee or by the department to | the obligor's employer, described as a payor of income under | chapter 65, subchapter IV 4, without first filing a petition | or comparable pleading or registering the order with a | tribunal of this State. |
|
| (This is Section 501 of the Uniform Act.) |
|
| In 1984 Congress mandated that all States adopt procedures for | enforcing income-withholding orders of sister States. Direct | recognition by the out-of-state obligor's employer of a | withholding order issued by another State long was sought by | support enforcement associations and other advocacy groups. In | 1992 UIFSA recognized such a procedure. The article was | extensively amended in 1996, but was the subject only of | clarifying amendments in 2001. |
|
| Section 501 is deliberately written in the passive voice; the | Act does not restrict those who may send an income-withholding | order across state lines. Although the sender will ordinarily | be a child support enforcement agency or the obligee, the | obligor or any other person may supply an employer with the | income-withholding order. "Sending a copy" of a withholding | order to an employer is clearly distinguishable from "service" | of that order on the same employer. Service of an order | necessarily intends to invoke a tribunal's authority over an | employer doing business in the State. Thus, for there to be | valid "service" of a withholding order on an employer in a | State, the tribunal must | have authority to bind the employer. In most cases, this | requires the assertion of the authority of a local responding | tribunal in a "registration for enforcement" proceeding. In | short, the |
|
|