| The amendments of 2001 added Section 615, which expands upon |
| language moved from Section 611 (a)(2). A tribunal of one of |
| the several States may modify a support order of a foreign |
| country or political subdivision when a tribunal of the |
| foreign jurisdiction would have jurisdiction to modify its |
| order under the standards of UIFSA, but under the law or |
| procedure of that foreign jurisdiction the tribunal will not |
| or may not exercise that jurisdiction to modify its order. The |
| standard example cited for the necessity of this special rule |
| involves the conundrum posed to a tribunal of a foreign |
| country having a requirement that the parties be physically |
| present in order to sustain a modification of child support, |
| and lacking the authority to compel a party residing outside |
| of the borders of the country to appear. In such an instance, |
| a tribunal of the forum State may modify the order if it has |
| personal jurisdiction over both parties, including |
| jurisdiction over the absent party who has submitted to the |
| jurisdiction of the forum by making a request for modification |
| of the support order. |