|
Incarcerating Juveniles in Adult Jails, 66 Ind. L.J. 999, 1021 | (1991). Exempting these programs serves the same policies as are | served by the peer mediation exclusion for non-incarcerated | youths. The Drafters do not intend to exclude cases where at | least one party is not a resident, such as a class action suit | against a non-resident in which the parties mediate or attempt | to mediate the case. |
|
| 7. Section 3(c). Alternative of non-privileged mediation. |
|
| This Section allows the parties to opt for a non-privileged | mediation or mediation session by mutual agreement, and | furthers the Act's policy of party self-determination. If the | parties so agree, the privilege sections of the Act do not | apply, thus fulfilling the parties reasonable expectations | regarding the confidentiality of that mediation or session. | For example, parties in a sophisticated commercial mediation, | who are represented by counsel, may see no need for a | privilege to attach to a mediation or session, and may by | express written agreement "opt out" of the Act's privilege | provisions. Similarly, parties may also use this option if | they wish to rely on, and therefore use in evidence, | statements made during the mediation. It is the parties rather | than the mediator who make this choice, although a mediator | could presumably refuse to mediate a mediation or session that | is not covered by this Act. Even if the parties do not agree | in advance, the parties, mediator, and all nonparty | participants can waive the privilege pursuant to Section 5. In | this instance, however, the mediator and other participants | can block the waiver in some respects. |
|
| If the parties want to opt out, they should inform the | mediators or nonparty participants of this agreement, because | without actual notice, the privileges of the Act still apply | to the mediation communications of the persons who have not | been so informed until such notice is actually received. Thus, | for example, if a nonparty participant has not received notice | that the opt-out has been invoked, and speaks during a | mediation, that mediation communication is privileged under | the Act. If, however, one of the parties or the mediator tells | the nonparty participant that the opt-out has been invoked, | the privilege no longer attaches to statements made after the | actual notice has been provided, even though the earlier | statements remain privileged because of the lack of notice. |
|
| The Act would apply to all mediations that fit the definitions | of mediation by a mediator unless specifically excluded by the | State adopting the Act. For example, a State may want to | exclude international commercial conciliation, which is | covered by | specific statute in some States. See, e.g., N.C. Gen. Stat. |
|
|