LD 1567
pg. 183
Page 182 of 185 An Act To Implement Recommendations of the MCJUSTIS Policy Board Concerning the... Page 184 of 185
Download Bill Text
LR 526
Item 1

 
The original resolve directed the MCJUSTIS policy board to
propose only those changes to the laws that are necessary to
result in a unique statutory cite for each violation. In working
through each crime and civil violation in the Maine Revised

 
Statutes, the MCJUSTIS policy board and staff used drafting
standards that were adopted in Public Law 2001, chapter 383 and
sought input from state department and agency representatives,
including assistance from the Attorney General's office.
Comments and drafting suggestions from these departments were
incorporated into this bill.

 
In addition to the MCJUSTIS formatting changes, Public Law
2001, chapter 383 identified several drafting changes that were
substantive in nature and necessary to accomplish the MCJUSTIS
policy board's directive. These changes also apply in this bill.
Specifically, the category of substantive changes that are
necessary relates to how to handle facts about a crime that are
not technically elements of the crime but are currently used for
determining the class of crime for sentencing purposes. The
statute currently does not require that such "enhancers" be
proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution. The Law
Court has required, however, that the prosecution must prove such
facts beyond a reasonable doubt if the facts are to be used to
make the underlying crime a higher class than it would otherwise
be or would require a specific punishment. This bill
incorporates each enhancer into the elements of the crime that it
enhances. This results in the statutory requirement that the
enhancer be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a
conviction for that crime at that class. The enhancers that this
bill includes are for prior convictions. When a person has a
prior conviction for committing the same or another crime, that
prior conviction may sometimes be used to enhance the penalty,
but the State must plead and prove to a jury that the prior
conviction did occur, instead of the court making that
determination in order to enhance a crime at the point of
sentencing.

 
The bill adopts the standard language used in Public Law 2001,
chapter 383 for referring to prior convictions when prior
convictions are used to affect one class of a newly committed
crime. Provisions in the bill that include these prior
convictions cite the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 17-A, section
9-A, which provides general rules for using prior convictions to
enhance a new crime. These general rules are consistent with
most existing provisions concerning the use of prior convictions.

 
The bill rewrites as an element of a crime any fact regarding
the crime that is used to establish the class for the crime or
the appropriate sentence. This is a substantive change,


Page 182 of 185 Top of Page Page 184 of 185