| In addition to the MCJUSTIS formatting changes, Public Law |
2001, chapter 383 identified several drafting changes that were |
substantive in nature and necessary to accomplish the MCJUSTIS |
policy board's directive. These changes also apply in this bill. |
Specifically, the category of substantive changes that are |
necessary relates to how to handle facts about a crime that are |
not technically elements of the crime but are currently used for |
determining the class of crime for sentencing purposes. The |
statute currently does not require that such "enhancers" be |
proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution. The Law |
Court has required, however, that the prosecution must prove such |
facts beyond a reasonable doubt if the facts are to be used to |
make the underlying crime a higher class than it would otherwise |
be or would require a specific punishment. This bill |
incorporates each enhancer into the elements of the crime that it |
enhances. This results in the statutory requirement that the |
enhancer be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a |
conviction for that crime at that class. The enhancers that this |
bill includes are for prior convictions. When a person has a |
prior conviction for committing the same or another crime, that |
prior conviction may sometimes be used to enhance the penalty, |
but the State must plead and prove to a jury that the prior |
conviction did occur, instead of the court making that |
determination in order to enhance a crime at the point of |
sentencing. |