LD 1851
pg. 18
Page 17 of 90 An Act To Implement the Recommendations of the Family Law Advisory Commission w... Page 19 of 90
Download Bill Text
LR 2675
Item 1

 
by clear and convincing evidence" was eliminated from the Act. The
same fate was accorded the statement that: "If two or more
presumptions arise which conflict with each other, the presumption
which on the facts is founded on the weightier considerations of
policy and logic controls." Nowadays the existence of modern
genetic testing obviates this old approach to the problem of
conflicting presumptions when a court is to determine paternity.
Nowadays, genetic testing makes it possible in most cases to
resolve competing claims to paternity. Moreover, courts may use the
estoppel principles in § 608 in appropriate circumstances to deny
requests for genetic testing in the interests of preserving a
child's ties to the presumed or acknowledged father who openly held
himself out as the child's father regardless of whether he is in
fact the genetic father.

 
Maine Comment

 
Section 1844 is made gender neutral and preserves, for
example, a child's ties to the presumed parent who for the first
two years of the child's life openly held the child out as that
person's own child regardless of whether that person is in fact
a genetic parent.

 
SUBCHAPTER 3

 
VOLUNTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PATERNITY

 
Comment

 
Voluntary acknowledgment of paternity has long been an
alternative to a contested paternity suit. Under UPA (1973) § 4,
the inclusion of a man's name on the child's birth certificate
created a presumption of paternity, which could be rebutted. In
order to improve the collection of child support, especially from
unwed fathers, the U.S. Congress mandated a fundamental change in
the acknowledgment procedure. The Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, also known
as the Welfare Reform Act) conditions receipt of federal child
support enforcement funds on state enactment of laws that greatly
strengthen the effect of a man's voluntary acknowledgment of
paternity, 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(5)(C). This statute is reproduced
in Appendix: Federal IV-D Statute Relating to Parentage, infra.
In brief, it provides that a valid, unrescinded, unchallenged
acknowledgment of paternity is to be treated as equivalent to a
judicial determination of paternity.

 
Because in many respects the federal act is nonspecific, the
new UPA contains clear and comprehensive procedures to comply
with the federal mandate. Primary among the factual circumstances
that
Congress did not take into account was that a married woman


Page 17 of 90 Top of Page Page 19 of 90