|
| If a state chooses to enact subsection (b)(2), one of the major |
| criticisms of Lehr v. Robertson, supra, will be eliminated. In |
| Lehr, although the genetic father did not avail himself of the New |
| York putative fathers registry, he had filed a "visitation and |
| paternity" petition in another local court. The trial judge in the |
| adoption proceeding knew the identity of the biological father, |
| where he could be located, and that he was seeking to establish his |
| paternity in another court. Nonetheless, the court granted the |
| adoption and terminated the genetic father's parental rights |
| without notice to him. Subsection (b)(2) exempts an alleged father |
| from the requirement of registration if the man "commences a |
| proceeding to adjudicate his paternity before the court has |
| terminated his parental rights." |