| If a state chooses to enact subsection (b)(2), one of the major |
criticisms of Lehr v. Robertson, supra, will be eliminated. In |
Lehr, although the genetic father did not avail himself of the New |
York putative fathers registry, he had filed a "visitation and |
paternity" petition in another local court. The trial judge in the |
adoption proceeding knew the identity of the biological father, |
where he could be located, and that he was seeking to establish his |
paternity in another court. Nonetheless, the court granted the |
adoption and terminated the genetic father's parental rights |
without notice to him. Subsection (b)(2) exempts an alleged father |
from the requirement of registration if the man "commences a |
proceeding to adjudicate his paternity before the court has |
terminated his parental rights." |