LD 1851
pg. 47
Page 46 of 90 An Act To Implement the Recommendations of the Family Law Advisory Commission w... Page 48 of 90
Download Bill Text
LR 2675
Item 1

 
at stake in a paternity proceeding supports the conclusion that the
standard of proof normally applied in private litigation is also
appropriate for these cases." Rivera v. Minnich, 483 U.S. 574, 581
(1987).

 
A corresponding amendment to UPC § 2-114 was not made until
the major revision of 1990 (as further revised in 1993). By that
time, it had been recognized as illogical and unjust to impose
discriminatory burdens on children born out-of-wedlock who were
seeking paternal inheritance. It also had been ruled
unconstitutional by application of the intermediate scrutiny test
formulated under the 14th Amendment. Reed v. Campbell, 476 U.S.
852 (1986) Moreover, by 1990 the preponderance of the evidence
standard had been widely applied to determinations of paternity
and probate proceedings. Against this background, UPC (1993)
abandoned the clear and convincing evidence standard for
determining paternal relationships.

 
§1922.__Standing to maintain proceeding

 
Subject to subchapter 3 and sections 1927 and 1929, a
proceeding to adjudicate parentage may be maintained by:

 
1.__Child.__The child;

 
2.__Mother.__The mother of the child;

 
3.__Person whose parentage to be adjudicated.__A person whose
parentage of the child is to be adjudicated;

 
4.__Support enforcement agency.__The support enforcement
agency or other governmental agency authorized by other law;

 
5.__Agency.__An authorized adoption agency or licensed child-
placing agency;

 
6.__Representative of individual.__A representative authorized
by law to act for an individual who would otherwise be entitled
to maintain a proceeding but who is deceased, incapacitated or a
minor; or

 
7.__Intended parent.__An intended parent under subchapter 7 or
8.

 
Comment

 
(This is section 602 of the UPA.)

 
Source: UPA (1973) § 6.


Page 46 of 90 Top of Page Page 48 of 90