LD 1851
pg. 50
Page 49 of 90 An Act To Implement the Recommendations of the Family Law Advisory Commission w... Page 51 of 90
Download Bill Text
LR 2675
Item 1

 
Subsection (c) takes the common sense approach that a court
should not be dissuaded from making a parentage decision, even if
it cannot bind all appropriate parties. In the scenario described
above, binding the mother and alleged father to a decision of the
man's parentage may not technically bind the husband (the
presumed father), but more than likely it will end litigation on
the subject.

 
§1925.__Venue

 
Venue for a proceeding to adjudicate parentage is in the
judicial division of this State in which:

 
1.__Child.__The child resides or is found;

 
2.__Respondent.__The respondent resides or is found if the
child does not reside in this State; or

 
3.__Estate proceeding.__A proceeding for probate or
administration of the presumed parent's or alleged father's
estate has been commenced.

 
Comment

 
(This is section 605 of the UPA.)

 
Source: UPA (1973) § 8(c).

 
The venue provision provides choices proven to be reasonable
and convenient since its inclusion in the 1973 Act.

 
§1926.__No limitation: child having no presumed parent,

 
acknowledged father or adjudicated parent

 
A proceeding to adjudicate the parentage of a child having no
presumed parent, acknowledged father or adjudicated parent may be
commenced at any time, even after:

 
1.__Child.__The child becomes an adult, but only if the child
initiates the proceeding; or

 
2.__Earlier proceeding dismissed.__An earlier proceeding to
adjudicate parentage has been dismissed based on the application
of a statute of limitation then in effect.

 
Comment

 
(This is section 606 of the UPA.)

 
Source: UPA (1973) §§ 6, 7.


Page 49 of 90 Top of Page Page 51 of 90