LD 1851
pg. 83
Page 82 of 90 An Act To Implement the Recommendations of the Family Law Advisory Commission w... Page 84 of 90
Download Bill Text
LR 2675
Item 1

 
(This is section 803 of the UPA.)

 
Source: USCACA § 6(b).

 
This pre-conception authorization process for a gestational
agreement is roughly analogous to prevailing adoption procedures
in place in most states. Just as adoption contemplates the
transfer of parentage of a child from the birth parents to the
adoptive parents, a gestational agreement involves the transfer
from the gestational mother to the intended parents. The Act is
designed to protect the interests of the child to be born under
the gestational agreement as well as the interests of the
gestational mother and the intended parents.

 
In contrast to USCACA (1988) § 1(3), there is no requirement
that at least one of the intended parents be genetically related
to the child born of a gestational agreement. Similarly, the
likelihood that the gestational mother will also be the genetic
mother is not directly addressed in the new Act, while USCACA
(1988) apparently assumed that such a fact pattern would be
typical. Experience with the intractable problems caused by such
a combination has dissuaded the majority of fertility
laboratories from following that practice. See In re Matter of
Baby M., 537 A.2d 1227 (N.J. 1988).

 
This section seeks to protect the interests of the child in
several ways. The major protection of the child is the
authorization procedure itself. The Act requires closely
supervised gestational arrangements to ensure the security and
well being of the child. Once a petition has been filed,
subsection (a) permits--but does not require--the court to
validate a gestational agreement. If it validates, the court must
declare that the intended parents will be the parents of any
child born pursuant to, and during the term of, the agreement.

 
Subsection (b) requires the court to make five separate
findings before validating the agreement. Subsection (b)(1)
requires the court to ensure that the 90-day residency
requirement of § 802 has been satisfied and that it has
jurisdiction over the parties;

 
Under subsection(b)(2), the court will be informed of the
results of a home study of the intended parents who must satisfy
the suitability standards required of prospective adoptive
parents.

 
The interests of all the parties are protected by subsection
(b)(3), which is designed to protect the individuals involved
from the possibility of overreaching or fraud. The court must


Page 82 of 90 Top of Page Page 84 of 90