E.__Whether public disclosure puts a business at a competitive disadvantage and, if so, whether that business's interest substantially outweighs the public interest in the disclosure of records;

F.__Whether public disclosure compromises the position of a public body in negotiations and, if so, whether that public body's interest substantially outweighs the public interest in the disclosure of records;

G.__Whether public disclosure jeopardizes the safety of a member of the public or the public in general and, if so, whether that safety interest substantially outweighs the public interest in the disclosure of records;

H.__Whether the exception is as narrowly tailored as possible; and

I.__Any other criteria that assist the review committee in determining the value of the exception as compared to the public's interest in the record protected by the exception.

3.__Assistance from committees of jurisdiction.__The review committee shall seek assistance in evaluating public records exceptions from the joint standing committees of the Legislature having jurisdiction over the subject matter related to the exceptions being reviewed.__The review committee may hold joint public hearings with the appropriate committees of jurisdiction.__ The review committee shall notify the appropriate committees of jurisdiction concerning work sessions and shall allow members of the appropriate committees of jurisdiction to participate in work sessions.

§433.__Schedule for review of exceptions to public records

1.__Scheduling guidelines.__The joint standing committee of the Legislature having jurisdiction over judiciary matters shall review public records exceptions as follows.

A.__In 2006 and every 10 years thereafter, the committee shall review exceptions codified in:

(1)__Title 1;

(2)__Title 2;