|
projected performance indicators for the specified state fiscal | years. |
|
| A.__For fiscal year 2006-07: |
|
| (1)__The benchmark for the state share of the total | cost of the essential programs and services described | in Title 20-A, section 15671 is 48.0%; and |
|
| (2)__The projected performance indicator for the | related reduction in local property tax commitment to | fund the cost of the essential programs and services | described in Title 20-A, section 15671 is a local | property tax commitment that is less than the local | property tax commitment made in fiscal year 2005-06. |
|
| B.__For fiscal year 2007-08: |
|
| (1)__The benchmark for the state share of the total | cost of the essential programs and services described | in Title 20-A, section 15671 is 50.0%; and |
|
| (2)__The projected performance indicator for the | related reduction in local property tax commitment to | fund the cost of the essential programs and services | described in Title 20-A, section 15671 is a local | property tax commitment that is less than the local | property tax commitment made in fiscal year 2006-07. |
|
| C.__For fiscal year 2008-09: |
|
| (1)__The benchmark for the state share of the total | cost of the essential programs and services described | in Title 20-A, section 15671 is 52.5%; and |
|
| (2)__The projected performance indicator for the | related reduction in local property tax commitment to | fund the cost of the essential programs and services | described in Title 20-A, section 15671 is a local | property tax commitment that is less than the local | property tax commitment made in fiscal year 2007-08. |
|
| D.__For fiscal year 2009-10: |
|
| (1)__The benchmark for the state share of the total | cost of the essential programs and services described | in Title 20-A, section 15671 is 55.0%; and |
|
| (2)__The projected performance indicator for the related | reduction in local property tax commitment to |
|
|