LD 509
pg. 141
Page 140 of 183 An Act To Adopt the Maine Uniform Securities Act Page 142 of 183
Download Bill Text
LR 441
Item 1

 
1. Under Section 509 violations of two or more sections can
be proven, but the remedy is limited either to rescission or
actual damages. Actual damages means compensatory damages.
Punitive or "double" damages are not provided by this section
which also is the standard under Section 28(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. See 9 Louis Loss & Joel Seligman,
Securities Regulation 4408-4427 (3d ed. rev. 1992).

 
2. The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998
cited in Section 509(a) modifies the entire Section 509.

 
3. As with Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933,
Section 509(b) contains a type of privity requirement in that the
purchaser is required to bring an action against the seller.
Section 509(b) is broader than Section 12(a)(2) in that it will
reach all sales in violation of Section 301, not just sales "by
means of a prospectus" as is the law under Section 12(a)(2). See
Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561 (1995).

 
4. Unlike the current standards on implied rights of action
under Rule 10b-5, neither causation nor reliance has been held to
be an element of a private cause of action under the precursor to
Section 509(b). See Gerhard W. Gohler, IRA v. Wood, 919 P.2d 561
(Utah 1996); Ritch v. Robinson-Humprhey Co., 748 So. 2d 861 (Ala.
1999); Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp., 754 A.2d 1188 (N.J. 2000).

 
5. The measure of damages in Section 509(b)(3) is that
contemplated by Section 12 of the Securities of 1933. See 9 Louis
Loss and Joel Seligman, Securities Regulations 4242-4246 (3d ed.
1992). The measure of damages in Section 509(c)(3), however, is
that contemplated by Rule 10b-5. Sec. 9 id. 4408-4427. In
providing for damages as an alternative to rescission, Section
509(b)(3) follows the 1956 Act and is an improvement upon many
earlier state provisions, which conditioned the plaintiff's right
of recovery on his or her being in a position to make a good
tender. A plaintiff is not given the right under this type of
statutory formula to retain stock and also seek damages.

 
6. Sections 509(e) and (f) are based on a proposed NASAA
amendment to the Uniform Securities Act adopted in order "to
establish civil liability for individuals who willfully violate
Section 102 dealing with fraudulent practices pertaining to
advisory activities." Neither provision is intended to limit
other state law claims for providing investment advice.

 
7. Broker-dealer employees, including research analysts, who
receive no special compensation from third parties for investment
advice would not be liable under Section 509(f).


Page 140 of 183 Top of Page Page 142 of 183