| | 1. Under Section 509 violations of two or more sections can | be proven, but the remedy is limited either to rescission or | actual damages. Actual damages means compensatory damages. | Punitive or "double" damages are not provided by this section | which also is the standard under Section 28(a) of the Securities | Exchange Act of 1934. See 9 Louis Loss & Joel Seligman, | Securities Regulation 4408-4427 (3d ed. rev. 1992). |
|
| | 2. The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 | cited in Section 509(a) modifies the entire Section 509. |
|
| | 3. As with Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, | Section 509(b) contains a type of privity requirement in that the | purchaser is required to bring an action against the seller. | Section 509(b) is broader than Section 12(a)(2) in that it will | reach all sales in violation of Section 301, not just sales "by | means of a prospectus" as is the law under Section 12(a)(2). See | Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561 (1995). |
|
| | 4. Unlike the current standards on implied rights of action | under Rule 10b-5, neither causation nor reliance has been held to | be an element of a private cause of action under the precursor to | Section 509(b). See Gerhard W. Gohler, IRA v. Wood, 919 P.2d 561 | (Utah 1996); Ritch v. Robinson-Humprhey Co., 748 So. 2d 861 (Ala. | 1999); Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp., 754 A.2d 1188 (N.J. 2000). |
|
| | 5. The measure of damages in Section 509(b)(3) is that | contemplated by Section 12 of the Securities of 1933. See 9 Louis | Loss and Joel Seligman, Securities Regulations 4242-4246 (3d ed. | 1992). The measure of damages in Section 509(c)(3), however, is | that contemplated by Rule 10b-5. Sec. 9 id. 4408-4427. In | providing for damages as an alternative to rescission, Section | 509(b)(3) follows the 1956 Act and is an improvement upon many | earlier state provisions, which conditioned the plaintiff's right | of recovery on his or her being in a position to make a good | tender. A plaintiff is not given the right under this type of | statutory formula to retain stock and also seek damages. |
|
| | 6. Sections 509(e) and (f) are based on a proposed NASAA | amendment to the Uniform Securities Act adopted in order "to | establish civil liability for individuals who willfully violate | Section 102 dealing with fraudulent practices pertaining to | advisory activities." Neither provision is intended to limit | other state law claims for providing investment advice. |
|
| | 7. Broker-dealer employees, including research analysts, who | receive no special compensation from third parties for investment | advice would not be liable under Section 509(f). |
|
|