| B.__Such disclosure documents as the administrator, by rule | or order, requires are delivered to each offeree or | purchaser; and |
|
| C.__Prior to any offer in this State, a notice specifying | the terms of the offer is filed with the administrator | together with a consent to service of process complying with | section 16611, signed by the issuer, and a filing fee of | $300 for each type or class of security being offered in | this State and the administrator does not by order disallow | the exemption within the next 5 full business days; or |
|
| | 26.__Nonpublic offerings under 4(2).__A security offered in a | nonpublic offering under Section 4(2) of the federal Securities | Act of 1933, 15 United States Code, Section 77d(2) if, no later | than 15 days after the first sale in this State, a notice on | "Form D," including the Appendix, as promulgated by the | Securities and Exchange Commission, is filed with the | administrator together with a consent to service of process | complying with section 16611, signed by the issuer, and a | nonrefundable filing fee of $300 for each type or class of | security sold.__An additional nonrefundable late filing fee of | $500 must be paid for a filing made between 16 and 30 days after | the first sale in this State. |
|
| | Prior Provisions: 1956 Act Section 402(b); RUSA Section 402. |
|
| | 1. Sections 202(1) through (8) are available only for | nonissuer transactions. An issuer selling securities in an | initial public offering or other offering may not rely on | Sections 202(1) through (8). A nonissuer, however, can rely on | any issuer transaction exemption such as Section 202(13), when | the exemption would be applicable to a nonissuer. The term | "nonissuer transaction or nonissuer distribution" is defined in | Section 102(18); the term "issuer" is defined in Section 102(17). |
|
| | 2. Section 202(1): Isolated nonissuer transactions: Prior | Provisions: 1956 Act Section 402(b)(1); RUSA Section 402(1). The | term "isolated transaction" is not defined in this Act, but left | to the states to develop. Historically under state law there has | been somewhat varied case law development of the term "isolated | transactions." See, e.g., Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. v. | Goettsch, 403 N.W.2d 772 (Iowa 1987) (isolated nonissuer | transaction exemption is not unconstitutionally vague); Allen v. | Schauf, 449 P.2d 1010 (Kan. 1969) (regulation defined isolated | transactions to not exceed four persons solicited in a 12 month | period); Nelson v. State, 355 P.2d 413, 420 (Okla. Ct. Crim. App. | 1960) ("[a]n isolated sale means one standing alone, disconnected |
|
|