LD 1526
pg. 11
Page 10 of 118 An Act To Enact the Uniform Parentage Act and Conforming Amendments and Additio... Page 12 of 118
Download Bill Text
LR 134
Item 1

 
Although the Maine Supreme Judicial Court has recognized the
equitable remedy of de facto parent, the UPA does not address the
de facto parentage. The UPA establishes who is the parent at the
time of conception, birth and for the first two years of a
child's life. In contrast, a de facto parent-child relationship
develops between a third person and a child over time. A court
may exercise its equitable jurisdiction and find, based on the
circumstances of a particular case, that a third person is a de
facto parent and consider an award of parental rights and
responsibilities based on the best interest of the child. See
(C.E.W. v. D.E.W., 2004 ME 43; Young v. Young, 2004 ME 44. The
UPA does not alter or weaken the equitable remedy of de facto
parent, a remedy that exists independent of the UPA.

 
§1834.__Court of this State

 
The District Court is authorized to adjudicate parentage under
this chapter, except that the Superior Court and the Probate
Court are authorized to adjudicate parentage under this chapter
when parentage is an issue in a proceeding or when a parentage
proceeding is joined with another proceeding as provided under
section 1930.

 
Comment

 
(This is section 104 of the UPA.)

 
Source: UPA (1973) § 8(a).

 
The court having jurisdiction over parentage proceedings under
this Act should be identified here. Although a proceeding to
determine parentage is most often associated with an action to
establish a child support order, the Act departs from the choice
made by the UIFSA (1996) § 102, which allows for the
establishment of a child support order by an administrative
agency. Insofar as establishment of parentage is concerned, the
new UPA reflects the deliberate decision by NCCUSL that an
"adjudication" should require a judicial proceeding. This
procedure is consistent with the practice of most states. In
fact, very few states provide for the resolution of disputed
paternity through administrative processes, which, of course, is
a policy judgment for the State legislature to make.

 
The term "tribunal" found in UIFSA to describe both courts and
agencies is not employed in the Act. Rather, the dispute
resolution entity in UPA (2002) is limited to a "court." UPA
(2002) conforms to the congressional determination that parentage
may also be established by an acknowledgment of parentage under
Article 3. Article 7 allows parentage to be established in a
written record that presumably could then be approved by an


Page 10 of 118 Top of Page Page 12 of 118