| | |
presumed father, Congress left it to the states to sort out which | | of the men should be recognized as the legal father. |
|
| | | Further, PRWORA does not require that a man acknowledging | | paternity must assert genetic paternity of the child. Section 301 | | is designed to prevent circumvention of adoption laws by | | requiring a sworn assertion of genetic parentage of the child. |
|
| | | Sections 302-305 clarify that, if a child has a presumed | | father, that man must file a denial of paternity in conjunction | | with another man's acknowledgment of paternity in order for the | | acknowledgement to be valid. If the presumed father is unwilling | | to cooperate, or his whereabouts are unknown, a court proceeding | | is necessary to resolve the issue of parentage. |
|
| | | Congress also directed that the acknowledgment can be | | "rescinded" within a particular timeframe, and subsequently can | | be "challenged" without stating a timeframe. Those procedures are | | dealt with in §§ 307-309. |
|
| | | Finally, the related issue of issuance or revision of birth | | certificates is left to other state law. |
|
| | | §1851.__Acknowledgment of paternity |
|
| | | The mother of a child and a man claiming to be the genetic | | father of the child may sign an acknowledgment of paternity with | | intent to establish the man's paternity. |
|
| | | (This is section 301 of the UPA.) |
|
| | | Source: 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(5)(C), see preceding Comment and | | Appendix: Federal IV-D Statute Relating to Parentage, infra. |
|
| | | PRWORA does not explicitly require that a man acknowledging | | parentage necessarily is asserting his genetic parentage of the | | child. In order to prevent circumvention of adoption laws, § 301 | | corrects this omission by requiring a sworn assertion of genetic | | parentage of the child. A 2002 amendment provides that a man who | | signs an acknowledgment of paternity declares that he is the | | genetic father of the child. Thus both the man and the mother | | acknowledge his paternity, under penalty of perjury, without | | requiring the parents to spell out the details of their sexual | | relations. Further, the amended language also takes into account | | a situation in which a man, who is unable to have sexual | | intercourse with his partner, may still have contributed to the | | conception of the child through the use of his own sperm. | | Henceforth, a man in | | that situation will be able to recognize |
|
|