LD 1609
pg. 114
Page 113 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 115 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
dissolution to bind the partnership in transactions that are
inconsistent with winding up. The partnership is bound in a
transaction not appropriate for winding up, however, only if the
partner's act would have bound the partnership under Section 301
before dissolution and the other party to the transaction did not
have notice of the dissolution. See Section 102(b) (notice).
Compare Section 301(1) (partner has apparent authority unless other
party knows or has received a notification of lack of authority).

 
Section 804(2) attempts to balance the interests of the
partners to terminate their mutual agency authority against the
interests of outside creditors who have no notice of the
partnership's dissolution. Even if the partnership is not bound
under Section 804, the faithless partner who purports to act for
the partnership after dissolution may be liable individually to
an innocent third party under the law of agency. See Section 330
of the Restatement (Second) of Agency (agent liable for
misrepresentation of authority), applicable under RUPA as
provided in Section 104(a).

 
RUPA eliminates the special and confusing UPA rules limiting
the authority of partners after dissolution. The special
protection afforded by UPA Section 35(1)(b)(I) to former
creditors and the lesser special protection afforded by UPA
Section 35(1)(b)(II) to other parties who knew of the partnership
before dissolution are both abolished. RUPA eschews these
cumbersome notice provisions in favor of the general apparent
authority rules of Section 301, subject to the effect of a filed
or recorded statement of dissolution under Section 805. This
enhances the protection of innocent third parties and imposes
liability on the partnership and the partners who choose their
fellow partner-agents and are in the best position to protect
others by providing notice of the dissolution.

 
Also deleted are the special rules for unknown partners in UPA
Section 35(2) and for certain causes of dissolution in UPA
Section 35(3). Those, too, are inconsistent with RUPA's policy
of adhering more closely to the general agency rules of Section
301.

 
Section 804 should be contrasted with Section 702, which winds
down the power of a partner being bought out. The power of a
dissociating partner is limited to transactions entered into
within two years after the partner's dissociation. Section 804
has no time limitation. However, the apparent authority of
partners in both situations is now subject to the filing of a
statement of dissociation or dissolution, as the case may be,
which operates to cut off such authority after 90 days.


Page 113 of 148 Top of Page Page 115 of 148