| | |
against partners who negligently caused fire that damaged | | partnership property). |
|
| | | 3. Generally, partners may limit or contract away their | | Section 405 remedies. They may not, however, eliminate entirely | | the remedies for breach of those duties that are mandatory under | | Section 103(b). See Comment 1 to Section 103. |
|
| | | 4. Section 405(c) replaces UPA Section 43 and provides that | | other (i.e., non-partnership) law governs the accrual of a cause | | of action for which subsection (b) provides a remedy. The | | statute of limitations on such claims is also governed by other | | law, and claims barred by a statute of limitations are not | | revived by reason of the partner's right to an accounting upon | | dissolution, as they were under the UPA. The effect of those | | rules is to compel partners to litigate their claims during the | | life of the partnership or risk losing them. Because an | | accounting is an equitable proceeding, it may also be barred by | | laches where there is an undue delay in bringing the action. | | Under general law, the limitations periods may be tolled by a | | partner's fraud. |
|
| | | 5. UPA Section 39 grants ancillary remedies to a person who | | rescinds his participation in a partnership because it was | | fraudulently induced, including the right to a lien on surplus | | partnership property for the amount of that person's interest in | | the partnership. RUPA has no counterpart provision to UPA Section | | 39, and leaves it to the general law of rescission to determine | | the rights of a person fraudulently induced to invest in a | | partnership. See Section 104(a). |
|
| | | §1046.__Continuation of partnership beyond definite term or |
|
| | | 1.__Rights and duties as at expiration or completion.__If a | | partnership for a definite term or particular undertaking is | | continued, without an express agreement, after the expiration of | | the term or completion of the undertaking, the rights and duties | | of the partners remain the same as they were at the expiration or | | completion, so far as is consistent with a partnership at will. |
|
| | | 2.__Presumption of agreement to continue.__If the partners, or | | those of them who habitually acted in the business during the | | term or undertaking, continue the business without any settlement | | or liquidation of the partnership, they are presumed to have | | agreed that the__partnership will continue. |
|
| | | (This is Section 406 of the Uniform Partnership Act (1997).) |
|
|