2. Identify for each listed mandate the precise legal origin of the mandate, whether state law or rule, a combination of both or any other originating authority. The Intergovernmental Advisory Group shall also provide notice and analysis of federal mandates that contribute to or conflict with specific state mandates on municipalities;

3. Identify the statewide local government costs of each listed mandate within the limits of practicability; and

4. Identify the characteristics of each listed mandate that cause the affected units of government to believe the mandate is deserving of review. Identified characteristics may include, but are not limited to, the following:

A. Archaic or unnecessary features or features lacking significant public purpose;

B. Inadequate funding;

C. Disproportionate efforts for the public policy benefit;

D. Coordination between federal law and regulation and state law and rule;

E. Subjection to excessive administrative oversight; and

F. An insufficient structure to predict, measure or control local costs; and be it further

Sec. 2. Participation of other entities. Resolved: That the Intergovernmental Advisory Group, in the conduct of its duties, may seek information from all related state agencies, statewide or regional associations representing municipalities and statewide associations representing the beneficiaries or interests that may be affected by the repeal, modification, redesign, enhanced coordination or delayed implementation of the mandates; and be it further

Sec. 3. Report. Resolved: That, no later than November 2, 2005, the Intergovernmental Advisory Group shall submit a report that includes its findings and recommendations, including suggested legislation, for presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on State and Local Government and the Legislative