An Act To Authorize a Casino To Benefit Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in the State
Sec. 1. 5 MRSA §12004-G, sub-§32-A is enacted to read:
Sport and Entertainment | Casino Development Commission | Legislative Per Diem and Expenses | 8 MRSA §1005-A |
Sec. 2. 8 MRSA §1001, sub-§6-A is enacted to read:
Sec. 3. 8 MRSA §1003, sub-§2, ¶B, as enacted by PL 2003, c. 687, Pt. A, §5 and affected by Pt. B, §11, is amended to read:
Sec. 4. 8 MRSA §1003, sub-§2, ¶B-1 is enacted to read:
Sec. 5. 8 MRSA §1005-A is enacted to read:
§ 1005-A. Casino Development Commission
Sec. 6. 8 MRSA §1011, sub-§2-B, as enacted by PL 2011, c. 699, §1, is repealed.
Sec. 7. 8 MRSA §1011, sub-§2-C is enacted to read:
Sec. 8. 8 MRSA §§1011-A and 1011-B are enacted to read:
§ 1011-A. County referendum
This section applies to referendum requirements for counties in which the commission is authorized to receive bids for the privilege to submit an application for a casino operator license to the board.
§ 1011-B. Privilege to submit a casino operator license application for a northern casino pursuant to competitive bidding
The privilege to submit an application to the board for a casino operator license for a casino in Washington County or Aroostook County is governed by this section.
Nothing in this section precludes an entity that is not a federally recognized Indian tribe from submitting a bid to the commission as long as the entity that is not a federally recognized Indian tribe has entered into a partnership agreement with the federally recognized Indian tribes that provided a statement to the commission indicating that they wished to be in a partnership for the operation of or ownership in a casino. The commission may require submission of documented expert analysis from a bidder to support the proposals submitted by the bidder.
(1) The bidder's commitment and capacity to make an initial minimum capital investment of $20,000,000 for a casino facility. Land acquisition, license fees and off-site improvements are not considered to be part of the minimum capital investment;
(2) The potential gross and net income to be generated by the bidder based upon documented, expert market analysis;
(3) The extent to which the bidder's market plans suit the character of the region and the local population in a way that encourages residents of the State to choose to patronize the bidder's proposed facility as opposed to gaming facilities in other states or provinces;
(4) The extent to which the bidder's proposed gambling facility can reasonably be expected to serve as a regional recreational gambling destination;
(5) The bidder's proposed capital investment in a gambling facility, proposed amenities associated with the facility and timing of capital investment expenditures in terms of ensuring the facility is profitable; and
(6) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant;
(1) The bidder's plan to be part of or enter into a partnership with 2 or more federally recognized Indian tribes in the State and the extent to which the proposed gambling facility will maximize employment opportunities and economic benefits for all federally recognized Indian tribes in the State;
(2) The bidder's workforce development plan and the extent to which it will maximize use of the region's existing labor force;
(3) The impact on economic development, existing and planned, in the region of the proposed gambling facility; and
(4) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant;
(1) The adequacy of transportation routes leading to the proposed location of the gambling facility;
(2) Any negative impact of the proposed location of the gambling facility on the municipality in which the facility is to be located, including but not limited to traffic congestion, worsened road safety conditions and increased safety concerns for pedestrian traffic;
(3) The proximity of the proposed location of the gambling facility to major transportation routes and the Canadian border in order to maximize patronage from cross-border traffic;
(4) The bidder's proposals for mitigating negative impacts identified under this paragraph; and
(5) Other factors, properly disclosed in the commission's request for proposals, that the commission determines to be relevant; and
(1) The bidder's plan to identify, address and minimize the potential for and existence of negative consequences associated with gambling and the operation of the bidder's proposed facility, including, but not limited to, a financial commitment to efforts to address problem gambling prevention, intervention, treatment and research;
(2) The effects, both positive and negative, that can be reasonably anticipated to be experienced by the municipality in which the proposed gambling facility is located and the communities in the region; and
(3) The likelihood that the bidder will meet the casino operator license requirements described in section 1016.
The commission shall consult with the Office of the Attorney General during the negotiation and execution of the contract. The contract must be approved by the Attorney General. The casino operator license issued by the board does not take effect and the board may not accept the license fee required under section 1018, subsection 1, paragraph C-2 until the contract is executed.
Sec. 9. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§1, ¶C, as enacted by PL 2003, c. 687, Pt. A, §5 and affected by Pt. B, §11, is amended to read:
Sec. 10. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§1, ¶C-1, as amended by PL 2011, c. 417, §4, is further amended to read:
Sec. 11. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§1, ¶¶C-2 to C-4 are enacted to read:
Sec. 12. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§1-A, as enacted by PL 2011, c. 699, §2, is repealed.
Sec. 13. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§2, as enacted by PL 2003, c. 687, Pt. A, §5 and affected by Pt. B, §11, is amended to read:
Sec. 14. 8 MRSA §1018, sub-§§2-A, 2-B and 3-A are enacted to read:
Sec. 15. 8 MRSA §1019, sub-§6, as amended by PL 2011, c. 417, §5, is further amended to read:
Sec. 16. 8 MRSA §1019, sub-§7, as amended by PL 2011, c. 417, §6, is repealed.
Sec. 17. 8 MRSA §1020, sub-§3, as amended by PL 2011, c. 585, §8, is further amended to read:
Sec. 18. 8 MRSA §1036, sub-§2-D is enacted to read:
Sec. 19. Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs authorized to submit legislation. The Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs is authorized to submit legislation to the Second Regular Session of the 127th Legislature establishing a manner of distribution of slot machine and table game revenue that will apply to a casino licensed pursuant to the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 8, section 1011-B in either Washington County or Aroostook County and amending the laws governing the issuance of casino operator licenses and the regulation of casinos based on rules of the Gambling Control Board that currently govern those functions.
SUMMARY
This bill is presented by the Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs pursuant to Resolve 2013, chapter 111. The bill establishes a competitive bid process for a casino in either Washington County or Aroostook County, the operation of which is stated to maximize economic and employment benefits for the 4 federally recognized Indian tribes in the State. The bill establishes the Casino Development Commission, which is an independent board of 5 members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The commission's purpose is to develop a request for proposals for the privilege to submit an application to the Gambling Control Board for a casino operator license. Prior to the commission's submitting a request for proposals for a casino operator license in either Washington County or Aroostook County, voters would have to approve the operation of a casino by a countywide referendum. The referendum must be held on the same date as a statewide election and no sooner than June 1, 2016 and no later than July 1, 2017. The fee to submit a bid to the commission is $100,000. The bill provides for specific supporting information to be submitted by the bidder and considered by the commission including the bidder's ability to make a minimum $20,000,000 capital investment in the casino and partnership with at least 2 federally recognized Indian tribes in the State.
Under the bill, the commission is directed to develop a point system for the factors to be considered in evaluating proposals and give priority to proposals that maximize the employment and economic benefits to federally recognized Indian tribes in the State. The winning bidder must enter into a contract with the commission that obligates the casino operator to abide by the proposals made in the winning bid. Failure to abide by the terms of the contract could result in financial penalties to the operator.
The license fee for a casino under the bill is $1,000,000 for a 5-year term with a renewal fee of $100,000.
The bill sets the distribution of net slot machine revenue for the casino at 46% and sets the distribution of net table game revenue for the casino at 16%. The bill authorizes the Joint Standing Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs to submit legislation establishing a distribution of the slot machine and table game revenue required to be paid by the casino.