An Act To Reduce Fraud in the Redemption of Beverage Containers
Sec. 1. 38 MRSA §3102, sub-§§1-A and 20-A are enacted to read:
Sec. 2. 38 MRSA §3107, sub-§3-A is enacted to read:
(1) The business name, initials or other identifying mark of the dealer or local redemption center; and
(2) The number of beverage containers contained within each bag, shell, box or other receptacle that are eligible for payment of refund value;
(1) For the first failed audit by the dealer or local redemption center, the initiator of deposit must provide to the dealer or local redemption center a warning regarding the actions that may be taken under subparagraphs (2) to (4) as a result of any subsequent failed audits;
(2) For the 2nd failed audit by the dealer or local redemption center, the initiator of deposit may assess against the audited dealer or local redemption center the percentage of the discrepancy determined during the failed audit on all beverage containers picked up by the initiator of deposit at the failed audit;
(3) For the 3rd failed audit by the dealer or local redemption center, the initiator of deposit may assess against the audited dealer or local redemption center the percentage of the discrepancy determined during the failed audit on all beverage containers picked up by the initiator of deposit from the dealer or local redemption center within the 30 days following the failed audit; and
(4) For the 4th and any subsequent failed audit by the dealer or local redemption center, the initiator of deposit may assess against the audited dealer or local redemption center the percentage of the discrepancy determined during the failed audit on all beverage containers picked up by the initiator of deposit from the dealer or local redemption center within the 60 days following the failed audit.
In taking the actions authorized under subparagraphs (2) to (4), an initiator of deposit may consider only those failed audits of the dealer or local redemption center that were conducted by or at the request of the initiator of deposit within a one-year period prior to the failed audit for which the initiator of deposit seeks to take such authorized actions; and
"You have 30 days from your receipt of this notice to contest the action described in this notice by filing a grievance with the Department of Environmental Protection. The filing must briefly describe the basis for the grievance and must include a copy of this notice, and copies of the filing must be provided to the initiator of deposit that requested the audit and to the auditor named in this notice."
The department shall adopt rules, which are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2-A, governing the conduct of a grievance hearing and the issuance of a decision on a grievance. The rules must provide an informal process for the conduct of grievance hearings and may not require compliance with strict evidentiary rules at such hearings; must require the auditor to demonstrate to the department's satisfaction that the dealer or local redemption center failed the audit that constitutes the basis for the proposed action; and must require the department to provide a written decision subsequent to the close of a grievance hearing to all parties to the hearing.
Sec. 3. 38 MRSA §3107, sub-§4, as enacted by PL 2015, c. 166, §14, is amended to read:
summary
This bill amends the State's bottle redemption laws to authorize initiators of deposit subject to a commingling agreement to include in the agreement authorization to conduct audits of beverage containers presented by a dealer or local redemption center for pickup or payment of refund value and to take certain actions against the dealer or local redemption center in the case of a failed audit. The bill also provides for a grievance process whereby a dealer or local redemption center may file a grievance with the Department of Environmental Protection to challenge an action taken by an initiator of deposit in the case of a failed audit.