Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

PUBLIC LAWS OF MAINE
Second Regular Session of the 119th

CHAPTER 633
S.P. 630 - L.D. 1795

An Act to Validate Pierringer Releases in Multiparty Lawsuits

Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:

     Sec. 1. 14 MRSA §156, as amended by PL 1971, c. 8, is further amended to read:

§156. Comparative negligence

     Where When any person suffers death or damage as a result partly of his that person's own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons, a claim in respect of that death or damage shall may not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect thereof shall must be reduced to such extent as the jury thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage.

     Where When damages are recoverable by any person by virtue of this section, subject to such reduction as is mentioned, the court shall instruct the jury to find and record the total damages which that would have been recoverable if the claimant had not been at fault, and further instruct the jury to reduce the total damages by dollars and cents, and not by percentage, to the extent deemed considered just and equitable, having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damages, and instruct the jury to return both amounts with the knowledge that the lesser figure is the final verdict in the case.

     Fault means negligence, breach of statutory duty or other act or omission which that gives rise to a liability in tort or would, apart from this section, give rise to the defense of contributory negligence.

     If such claimant is found by the jury to be equally at fault, the claimant shall may not recover.

     In a case involving multi-party multiparty defendants, each defendant shall be is jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff for the full amount of the plaintiff's damages. However, any defendant shall have has the right through the use of special interrogatories to request of the jury the percentage of fault contributed by each defendant. If a defendant is released by the plaintiff under an agreement that precludes the plaintiff from collecting against remaining parties that portion of any damages attributable to the released defendant's share of responsibility, then the following rules apply.

     1. General rule. The released defendant is entitled to be dismissed with prejudice from the case. The dismissal bars all related claims for contribution assertable by remaining parties against the released defendant.

     2. Post-dismissal procedures. The trial court must preserve for the remaining parties a fair opportunity to adjudicate the liability of the released and dismissed defendant. Remaining parties may conduct discovery against a released and dismissed defendant and invoke evidentiary rules at trial as if the released and dismissed defendant were still a party.

     3. Binding effect. To apportion responsibility in the pending action for claims that were included in the settlement and presented at trial, a finding on the issue of the released and dismissed defendant's liability binds all parties to the suit, but such a finding has no binding effect in other actions relating to other damage claims.

     Sec. 2. 14 MRSA §163, as enacted by PL 1969, c. 19, is amended to read:

§163. Release of joint tortfeasors

     Whenever a person seeks recovery for a personal injury or property damage caused by 2 or more persons, the settlement with or release of one or more of the persons causing the injury shall is not be a bar to a subsequent action against the other person or persons also causing the injury.

     Evidence of settlement with a release of one or more persons causing the injury shall is not be admissible at a subsequent trial against the other person or persons also causing the injury. After the jury has returned its verdict, the trial judge shall inquire of the attorneys for the parties whether such a settlement or release has occurred. If such settlement or release has occurred, the trial judge shall reduce the verdict by an amount equal to the settlement with or the consideration for the release of the other persons. With regard to a settlement in which the plaintiff has entered into an agreement that precludes the plaintiff from collecting against remaining parties that portion of any damages attributable to the settling defendant's share of responsibility, the judge shall reduce the plaintiff's judgment by either the amount determined at trial to be attributable to the settling defendant's share of responsibility, if any was found, or, if no such finding is made, by the value of the consideration given to the plaintiff for the settlement.

     Sec. 3. Application. This Act applies to all settlements entered into after the effective date of this Act.

Effective August 11, 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Revisor of Statutes Homepage Subject Index Search Laws of Maine Maine Legislature

About the 1999 Laws Of Maine

Previous PageTop Of PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Office of the Revisor of Statutes
State House, Room 108
Augusta, Maine 04333
(207) 287-1650 Fax: (207) 287-6468

Contact the Office of the Revisor of Statutes