|
under Section 209(a) [Me. cite section 1753, subsection 1] to | inform the court about the temporary emergency proceeding. These | pleading requirements are to be strictly followed so that the | courts are able to resolve the emergency, protect the safety of the | parties and the child, and determine a period for the duration of | the temporary order. |
|
| | Relationship to the PKPA. The definition of emergency has | been modified to harmonize it with the PKPA. The PKPA's | definition of emergency jurisdiction does not use the term | "neglect." It defines an emergency as "mistreatment or abuse." | Therefore "neglect" has been eliminated as a basis for the | assumption of temporary emergency jurisdiction. Neglect is so | elastic a concept that it could justify taking emergency | jurisdiction in a wide variety of cases. Under the PKPA, if a | State exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction based on a | finding that the child was neglected without a finding of | mistreatment or abuse, the order would not be entitled to federal | enforcement in other States. |
|
| | Relationship to Protective Order Proceedings. The UCCJA and | the PKPA were enacted long before the advent of state procedures | on the use of protective orders to alleviate problems of domestic | violence. Issues of custody and visitation often arise within | the context of protective order proceedings since the protective | order is often invoked to keep one parent away from the other | parent and the children when there is a threat of violence. This | Act recognizes that a protective order proceeding will often be | the procedural vehicle for invoking jurisdiction by authorizing a | court to assume temporary emergency jurisdiction when the child's | parent or sibling has been subjected to or threatened with | mistreatment or abuse. |
|
| | In order for a protective order that contains a custody | determination to be enforceable in another State it must comply | with the provisions of this Act and the PKPA. Although the | Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA), 18 U.S.C. § 2265, does | provide an independent basis for the granting of full faith and | credit to protective orders, it expressly excludes "custody" | orders from the definition of "protective order," 22 U.S.C. § | 2266. |
|
| | Many States authorize the issuance of protective orders in an | emergency without notice and hearing. This Act does not address | the propriety of that procedure. It is left to local law to | determine the circumstances under which such an order could be | issued, and the type of notice that is required, in a case | without an interstate element. However, an order issued after | the assumption of temporary emergency jurisdiction is entitled to | interstate enforcement and nonmodification under this Act and the |
|
|