| 3. "Possession." This section does not define "possession." |
| In determining whether a particular person has possession, the |
| principles of agency apply. For example, if the collateral |
| clearly is in possession of an agent of the secured party for the |
| purposes of possessing on behalf of the secured party, and if the |
| agent is not also an agent of the debtor, the secured party has |
| taken actual possession without the need to rely on a third-party |
| acknowledgment. See subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] |
| and Comments 4 and 8. However, if the agent is an agent of both |
| the secured party and the debtor, prudence might suggest that the |
| secured party obtain the agent's acknowledgment in order to |
| ensure perfection by possession. The debtor cannot qualify as an |
| agent for the secured party for purposes of the secured party's |
| taking possession. And, under appropriate circumstances, a court |
| may determine that a third person in possession is so closely |
| connected to or controlled by the debtor that the debtor has |
| retained effective possession, even though the third person may |
| have agreed to take possession on behalf of the secured party. |
| If so, the third person's taking possession would not constitute |
| the secured party's taking possession and would not be sufficient |
| for perfection. See also Section 9-205(b) [Maine cite section 9- |
| 1205, subsection (2)]. In a typical escrow arrangement, where |
| the escrowee holds possession of collateral as agent for both the |
| secured party and the debtor, the debtor's relationship to the |
| escrowee is not such as to constitute retention of possession by |
| the debtor. |