| 3. "Possession." This section does not define "possession." |
In determining whether a particular person has possession, the |
principles of agency apply. For example, if the collateral |
clearly is in possession of an agent of the secured party for the |
purposes of possessing on behalf of the secured party, and if the |
agent is not also an agent of the debtor, the secured party has |
taken actual possession without the need to rely on a third-party |
acknowledgment. See subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)] |
and Comments 4 and 8. However, if the agent is an agent of both |
the secured party and the debtor, prudence might suggest that the |
secured party obtain the agent's acknowledgment in order to |
ensure perfection by possession. The debtor cannot qualify as an |
agent for the secured party for purposes of the secured party's |
taking possession. And, under appropriate circumstances, a court |
may determine that a third person in possession is so closely |
connected to or controlled by the debtor that the debtor has |
retained effective possession, even though the third person may |
have agreed to take possession on behalf of the secured party. |
If so, the third person's taking possession would not constitute |
the secured party's taking possession and would not be sufficient |
for perfection. See also Section 9-205(b) [Maine cite section 9- |
1205, subsection (2)]. In a typical escrow arrangement, where |
the escrowee holds possession of collateral as agent for both the |
secured party and the debtor, the debtor's relationship to the |
escrowee is not such as to constitute retention of possession by |
the debtor. |