LD 2245
pg. 163
Page 162 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 164 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
receipt of notification of the security party's interest by a
bailee holding goods covered by a nonnegotiable document is
sufficient to perfect, even if the bailee does not acknowledge
receipt of the notification. A third person may acknowledge that
it will hold for the secured party's benefit goods to be received
in the future. Under these circumstances, perfection by
possession occurs when the third person obtains possession of the
goods.

 
Under subsection (c) [Maine cite subsection (3)],
acknowledgment of notification by a "lessee . . . in . . .
ordinary course of . . . business" (defined in Section 2A103)
does not suffice for possession. The section thus rejects the
reasoning of In re Atlantic Systems, Inc., 135 B.R. 463 (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. 1992) (holding that notification to debtor-lessor's
lessee sufficed to perfect security interest in leased goods).
See Steven O. Weise, Perfection by Possession: The Need for an
Objective Test, 29 Idaho Law Rev. 705 (1992-93) (arguing that
lessee's possession in ordinary course of debtor-lessor's
business does not provide adequate public notice of possible
security interest in leased goods). Inclusion of a per se rule
concerning lessees is not meant to preclude a court, under
appropriate circumstances, from determining that a third person
is so closely connected to or controlled by the debtor that the
debtor has retained effective possession. If so, the third
person's acknowledgment would not be sufficient for perfection.

 
5. No Relation Back. Former Section 9-305 provided that a
security interest is perfected by possession from the time
possession is taken "without a relation back." As the Comment to
former Section 9-305 observed, the relation-back theory, under
which the taking of possession was deemed to relate back to the
date of the original security agreement, has had little vitality
since the 1938 revision of the Federal Bankruptcy Act. The
theory is inconsistent with former Article 9 and with this
Article. See Section 9-313(d) [Maine cite section 9-1313,
subsection (4)]. Accordingly, this Article deletes the quoted
phrase as unnecessary. Where a pledge transaction is
contemplated, perfection dates only from the time possession is
taken, although a security interest may attach, unperfected. The
only exceptions to this rule are the short, 20-day periods of
perfection provided in Section 9-312(e), (f) and (g) [Maine cite
section 9-1312, subsections (5), (6) and (7)], during which a
debtor may have possession of specified collateral in which there
is a perfected security interest.

 
6. Certificated Securities. The second sentence of
subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)] reflects the
traditional rule for perfection of a security interest in
certificated securities. Compare Section 9-115(6) (1994 Official


Page 162 of 493 Top of Page Page 164 of 493