| The priority rule stated in paragraph (5) [Maine cite |
| subsection (5)] may seem anomalous, in that it can afford less |
| favorable treatment to purchasers who buy collateral outright |
| that to those who take a security interest in it. For example, a |
| buyer of a security certificate would cut off a security interest |
| perfected by filing only if the buyer achieves the status of a |
| protected purchaser under Section 8-303 [Maine cite section 8- |
| 1303]. The buyer would not be a protected purchaser, for |
| example, if it does not obtain "control" under Section 8-106 |
| [Maine cite section 8-1106] (e.g., if it fails to obtain a proper |
| indorsement of the certificate) or if it had notice of an adverse |
| claim under Section 8-105 [Maine cite section 8-1105]. The |
| apparent anomaly disappears, however, when one understands the |
| priority rule not as one intended to protect careless or guilty |
| parties, but as one that eliminates the need to conduct a search |
| of the public records only insofar as necessary to serve the |
| needs of the securities markets. |