LD 2245
pg. 235
Page 234 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 236 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
8-106(b) [Maine cite section 8-1106, subsection (2)]. However,
the secured party's acquisition of possession constitutes
"delivery" of the security certificate under Section 8-301 [Maine
cite section 8-1301] and serves to perfect the security interest
under Section 9-313(a) [Maine cite section 9-1313, subsection
(1)], even if the security certificate has not been appropriately
indorsed and has not been (re)registered in the secured party's
name. A security interest perfected by this method has priority
over a security interest perfected other than by control (e.g.,
by filing). See paragraph (5) [Maine cite subsection (5)].

 
The priority rule stated in paragraph (5) [Maine cite
subsection (5)] may seem anomalous, in that it can afford less
favorable treatment to purchasers who buy collateral outright
that to those who take a security interest in it. For example, a
buyer of a security certificate would cut off a security interest
perfected by filing only if the buyer achieves the status of a
protected purchaser under Section 8-303 [Maine cite section 8-
1303]. The buyer would not be a protected purchaser, for
example, if it does not obtain "control" under Section 8-106
[Maine cite section 8-1106] (e.g., if it fails to obtain a proper
indorsement of the certificate) or if it had notice of an adverse
claim under Section 8-105 [Maine cite section 8-1105]. The
apparent anomaly disappears, however, when one understands the
priority rule not as one intended to protect careless or guilty
parties, but as one that eliminates the need to conduct a search
of the public records only insofar as necessary to serve the
needs of the securities markets.

 
7. Secured Financing of Securities Firms. Priority questions
concerning security interests granted by brokers and securities
intermediaries are governed by the general control-beats-non-
control priority rule of paragraph (1) [Maine cite subsection
(1)], as supplemented by the special rules set out in paragraphs
(2) [Maine cite subsection (2)] (temporal priority-first to
control), (3) [Maine cite subsection (3)] (special priority for
securities intermediary), and (6) [Maine cite subsection (6)]
(equal priority for non-control). The following examples
illustrate the priority rules as applied to this setting. (In
all cases it is assumed that the debtor retains sufficient other
securities to satisfy all customers' claims. This section deals
with the relative rights of secured lenders to a securities firm.
Disputes between a secured lender and the firm's own customers
are governed by Section 8-511 [Maine cite section 8-1511].)

 
Example 7: Able & Co., a securities dealer, enters into
financing arrangements with two lenders, Alpha Bank and Beta
Bank. In each case the agreements provide that the lender will
have a security interest in the securities identified on lists


Page 234 of 493 Top of Page Page 236 of 493