LD 2245
pg. 248
Page 247 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 249 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
9-315(e) [Maine cite section 9-1315, subsection (5)].
Nevertheless, SP2's unperfected security interest in the goods
would be senior to SP1's security interest under Section 9-330(c)
[Maine cite section 9-1330, subsection (3)]. The result in this
priority contest is not affected by SP2's acquiescence or non-
acquiescence in the return of the goods to Dealer.

 
(2) Repossessed Goods. As explained above, Dealer
owns the chattel paper covering the goods, subject to
security interests in favor of SP1 and SP2. In Article
9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] parlance, Dealer has an
interest in chattel paper, not goods. If Dealer, SP1,
or SP2 repossesses the goods upon BIOCOB's default,
whether the repossession is rightful or wrongful as
among Dealer, SP1, or SP2, Dealer's interest will not
change. The location of goods and the party who
possesses them does not affect the fact that Dealer's
interest is in chattel paper, not goods. The goods
continue to be owned by BIOCOB. SP1's security
interest in the goods does not attach until such time
as Dealer reacquires an interest (other than a bare
possessory interest) in the goods. For example, Dealer
might buy the goods at a foreclosure sale from SP2
(whose security interest in the chattel paper is senior
to that of SP1); that disposition would cut off
BIOCOB's rights in the goods. Section 9-617 [Maine
cite section 9-1617].

 
In many cases the matter would end upon sale of the goods to
Dealer at a foreclosure sale and there would be no priority
contest between SP1 and SP2; Dealer would be unlikely to buy the
goods under circumstances whereby SP2 would retain its security
interest. There can be exceptions, however. For example, Dealer
may be obliged to purchase the goods from SP2 and SP2 may be
obliged to convey the goods to Dealer, but Dealer may fail to pay
SP2. Or, one could imagine that SP2, like SP1, has a general
security interest in the inventory of Dealer. In the latter
case, SP2 should not receive the benefit of any special priority
rule, since its interest in no way derives from priority under
Section 9-330 [Maine cite section 9-1330]. In the former case,
SP2's security interest in the goods reacquired by Dealer is
senior to SP1's security interest under Section 9-330 [Maine cite
section 9-1330].

 
b. Dealer's Outright Sale of Chattel Paper to SP2. Article
9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] also applies to a transaction
whereby SP2 buys the chattel paper in an outright sale
transaction without recourse against Dealer. Sections 1-
201(37), 9-109(a) [Maine cite section 9-1109, subsection
(1)]. Although Dealer does not, in such a transaction,


Page 247 of 493 Top of Page Page 249 of 493