| | | 9-315(e) [Maine cite section 9-1315, subsection (5)]. | | Nevertheless, SP2's unperfected security interest in the goods | | would be senior to SP1's security interest under Section 9-330(c) | | [Maine cite section 9-1330, subsection (3)]. The result in this | | priority contest is not affected by SP2's acquiescence or non- | | acquiescence in the return of the goods to Dealer. |
|
| | | (2) Repossessed Goods. As explained above, Dealer | | owns the chattel paper covering the goods, subject to | | security interests in favor of SP1 and SP2. In Article | | 9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] parlance, Dealer has an | | interest in chattel paper, not goods. If Dealer, SP1, | | or SP2 repossesses the goods upon BIOCOB's default, | | whether the repossession is rightful or wrongful as | | among Dealer, SP1, or SP2, Dealer's interest will not | | change. The location of goods and the party who | | possesses them does not affect the fact that Dealer's | | interest is in chattel paper, not goods. The goods | | continue to be owned by BIOCOB. SP1's security | | interest in the goods does not attach until such time | | as Dealer reacquires an interest (other than a bare | | possessory interest) in the goods. For example, Dealer | | might buy the goods at a foreclosure sale from SP2 | | (whose security interest in the chattel paper is senior | | to that of SP1); that disposition would cut off | | BIOCOB's rights in the goods. Section 9-617 [Maine | | cite section 9-1617]. |
|
| | | In many cases the matter would end upon sale of the goods to | | Dealer at a foreclosure sale and there would be no priority | | contest between SP1 and SP2; Dealer would be unlikely to buy the | | goods under circumstances whereby SP2 would retain its security | | interest. There can be exceptions, however. For example, Dealer | | may be obliged to purchase the goods from SP2 and SP2 may be | | obliged to convey the goods to Dealer, but Dealer may fail to pay | | SP2. Or, one could imagine that SP2, like SP1, has a general | | security interest in the inventory of Dealer. In the latter | | case, SP2 should not receive the benefit of any special priority | | rule, since its interest in no way derives from priority under | | Section 9-330 [Maine cite section 9-1330]. In the former case, | | SP2's security interest in the goods reacquired by Dealer is | | senior to SP1's security interest under Section 9-330 [Maine cite | | section 9-1330]. |
|
| | | b. Dealer's Outright Sale of Chattel Paper to SP2. Article | | 9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] also applies to a transaction | | whereby SP2 buys the chattel paper in an outright sale | | transaction without recourse against Dealer. Sections 1- | | 201(37), 9-109(a) [Maine cite section 9-1109, subsection | | (1)]. Although Dealer does not, in such a transaction, |
|
|