| The analysis with respect to lease chattel paper is similar to |
| that set forth above with respect to non-lease chattel paper. It |
| is complicated, however, by the fact that, unlike the case of |
| chattel paper arising out of a sale, Dealer retains a residual |
| interest in the goods. See Section 2A103(1)(q) (defining |
| "lessor's residual interest"); In re Leasing Consultants, Inc., |
| 486 F.2d 367 (2d Cir. 1973) (lessor's residual interest under |
| true lease is an interest in goods and is a separate type of |
| collateral from lessor's interest in the lease). If Dealer |
| leases goods to a "lessee in ordinary course of business" |
| (LIOCOB), then LIOCOB takes its interest under the lease (i.e., |
| its "leasehold interest") free of the security interest of SP1. |
| See Sections 2A307(3), 2A103(1)(m) (defining "leasehold |
| interest"), (1)(o) (defining "lessee in ordinary course of |
| business"). SP1 would, however, retain its security interest in |
| the residual interest. In addition, SP1 would acquire an |
| interest in the lease chattel paper as proceeds. If Dealer then |
| assigns the lease chattel paper to SP2, Section 9-330 [Maine cite |
| section 9-1330] gives SP2 priority over SP1 with respect to the |
| chattel paper, but not with respect to the residual interest in |
| the goods. Consequently, assignees of lease chattel paper |
| typically take a security interest in and file against the |
| lessor's residual interest in goods, expecting their priority in |
| the goods to be governed by the first-to-file-or-perfect rule of |
| Section 9-322 [Maine cite section 9-1322]. |